I sure hope that is not the case and only nasty chains remain, but if so, I'll happily starve to death before visiting an Applebee's or Olive Garden...We already lost 60 percent of restaurants forever.
I sure hope that is not the case and only nasty chains remain, but if so, I'll happily starve to death before visiting an Applebee's or Olive Garden...We already lost 60 percent of restaurants forever.
I sure hope that is not the case and only nasty chains remain, but if so, I'll happily starve to death before visiting an Applebee's or Olive Garden...
Of course good news goes unreported or at best is reported scarcely. You need to get with the program and stay on script. Good news is forbidden! And if that's hyperbole it is only ever so slightly.
I've been checking and/or linking the numbers daily.
Assuming this comment is correct, Arizona's 7 day rolling average of new diagnoses hit its plateau July 2 and started coming down July 11. It's now 28% down from the high.
Texas hit its plateau period from July 11 through July 22. Now down 18% from the high.
Florida is down 8% from their new diagnoses rolling average highs, so this still is more of an open question in the abstract. But with their ICU and general hospital bed space has been steady for two weeks (actually more beds have come available the last few days), I suspect this tends to confirm what Gottleib said.
As an aside, it's interesting that I see so little of this story in the media. Can't fathom why so few want to report some good news from these states . . .
Olive Garden? huhI sure hope that is not the case and only nasty chains remain, but if so, I'll happily starve to death before visiting an Applebee's or Olive Garden...
So just because the argument of "lots of people die anyway" and "it's inevitable that we'll all get the virus anyway" are two arguments that have been brought up on here, I have to point out that 17-30% (I've seen up to 60% but that seems like the outlier) of restaurants close within a year if opening at baseline. Just wondering how you compare and contrast the two.How many businesses can afford to shut down for a year and a half, continue to have to pay 80 percent of their expenses including rent, utilities, and still be around after? We already lost 60 percent of restaurants forever.
Curious if that's also happening in Europe. Their lockdowns were much stricter even in regions that weren't as heavily hit. Now we're seeing spikes again after they've begun reopening and allowing international travel. If so, it's starting to prove you can't hide from this virus forever or wait it out with lockdowns.
Do you know the annoying thing to come out of these MLB COVID-19 cases? Not only does it make the "WE SHOULD SHUT EVERYTHING DOWN!" crowd more obnoxious, but it's also making people act like the problem with the comeback is the travel, not the fact that players aren't social distancing and aren't wearing masks.
No clue why MLB thought this would work without putting people into a bubble.
No clue why MLB thought this would work without putting people into a bubble.
I don't think the problem here is not having a bubble, it's the MLB not requiring masks and social distancing. The goal isn't to have no COVID-19 cases, it's to not have a breakout with COVID-19 cases.
Yeah, but they were still allowed to go about their normal lives, yes?
The NBA players are in a bubble (although I guess maybe a few players have tried to game things with stuff like food?).
The NHL maybe should've done a bubble before this phase, but they're going into a bubble. I guess they'll be allowed to go out, which is a risk, but it's Canada, not a hot spot in the US like Miami. So even that's different.
Yes, but like I said, the point isn't to not have any COVID-19 cases. It's to not have any team outbreaks. You can make a traveling schedule work with knowing that you'll have some cases. You just have to keep players separated enough that they won't spread it to each other.
The GOP proposal, according to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, will transition to payments equal to roughly 70 percent of an individual's previous wages.
I sure hope that is not the case and only nasty chains remain, but if so, I'll happily starve to death before visiting an Applebee's or Olive Garden...
The states outdated infrastructure in that regard will just cause more and more problems. I agree, just lessen the amount. Maybe taper it off over time.If they're so hell-bent on unemployment benefits being too high, why not just decrease it instead of making this overly complicated system that most states wouldn't be able to implement?
If they're so hell-bent on unemployment benefits being too high, why not just decrease it instead of making this overly complicated system that most states wouldn't be able to implement?
GOP wants to drop the amount to $200/week and the Dems want it to stay at $600 so they will probably agree to $400.
It's sickening. And I'm sure no matter what else we've been arguing about all of us can agree to that. Its analogous to war profiteering and the rich keep getting richerSorry if this has been posted. It's a couple days old.
Corporate Insiders Pocket $1 Billion in Rush for Coronavirus Vaccine
I sure hope that is not the case and only nasty chains remain, but if so, I'll happily starve to death before visiting an Applebee's or Olive Garden...
You're quoting someone using sarcasm to mock shutdowns.