And that’s just one family. Luckily they all were negative but imagine if that positive case transferred to 3-4 other students who went home to their families for a day or two before realizing they had been in contact with an infected individual and then they stayed home but everyone in their family cohort is going about their business.
They seem to be desperately trying to redirect away from schools spreading the virus and trying to put the blame on social gatherings but I don’t buy it.
In my experience people who have been gathering or playing sports have been doing so at the same level since June and July but the case numbers rising has really been since kids have been back in school.
People have been going to restaurants and bars and parties and playing sports since June/July and case numbers throughout June, July and August were stable. Kids go back to school in September and all of a sudden the numbers start climbing then come October they are fully spiralling... hmmmmm.
This though is not borne out by any age related statistic. You haven't factored in either that the Edmonton specific numbers were atypical of the province, and the Edmonton numbers specifically, went up before anywhwere else in the province. Why?
What actually is being stated is due to a bunch of dunderheads (and Edmonton has more of those per capita than anywhere in Canada) deciding to have parties, gatherings and with the tracking data largely pointing that way.
Meanwhile there is hardly any cases in the 5-9 age range, either active, or new cases. They just aren't occurring much at all. Very low numbers. There is ramp up in 10-19 age range but this still representing the 4th largest number of either active, or new cases. Behind all of 20-29, 30-39, 40-49. I mean thats what the numbers actually ARE.
I mean any of us can check, all the data is there case notes are there, outbreaks are there, school specific data there. Why do people need to theorize on alternate theory when the data is actually at our disposal, and when you have trustworthy authorities like Hinshaw actually summarizing the data?
I mean its kind of silly to completely anecdotal, and refute all the data provided. Thats just people believing what they want to believe.