TheDoldrums
Registered User
I'm wondering if the Josh Anderson deal may have changed his demands.
If Anderson got 5.5M then Gallagher can demand 7.5M+ based on what he brings to that team. Such a dumb contract by Bergevin. He at least should’ve made it a one or two year “prove it” deal.
If Anderson got 5.5M then Gallagher can demand 7.5M+ based on what he brings to that team. Such a dumb contract by Bergevin. He at least should’ve made it a one or two year “prove it” deal.
Like Danault, doesn't like that he's now the third wheel among RW as far as respect goes.
Well, we keep getting told by the HF hive mind that there are no such things as "hurt feelings" in locker rooms. They are millionaires and will get over it. Once you step foot on the ice all ill will dissipates about dumb *** contracts your GM gives to unproven players who scored one (ONE!) goal the previous season. It's all good. Gallagher, one of the true warriors in this game will get over it.
And then he's a UFA and can leave lol. I agree it's a bad deal, but a 1 or 2 year deal could have been even worse.
Habs and Gallagher will go for 6x5 years and everyone will be happy
Gallaghers next contract is going to be scary
Just run with Caufield, Toffoli, Anderson at Rw
Montreal is a team that struggles to finish and Gallagher is by far their best goal scorer. IMO walking away from him would be a mistake.
Montreal is a team that struggles to finish and Gallagher is by far their best goal scorer. IMO walking away from him would be a mistake.
Yeah but Montreal isn't a winner, so maybe he was talking about once he hits UFA.The thing is, he has been quoted a few times as saying he'd take less to be part of a winner. Maybe he wasn't even approached with an offer yet.
Montreal is a team that struggles to finish and Gallagher is by far their best goal scorer. IMO walking away from him would be a mistake.