Being patient, to a point. I think our window is next year when the big teams all get in cap trouble (or, in the case of Anaheim will have gaping holes on their roster). If we get some of the kids you mentioned step up, we will be a legit contender.
But that means we need to win a few trades before then, or have some win-win trades.
Scherbak might be the only top 6 guy there, remains to be seen. Hudon and Andro are small. Tinordi might be a #4 one day... maybe. Or can Emelin improve to the point where he can play alongside PK??
Quick was very inconsistent before the Kings made those trades. It was still up for grabs with Bernier at that point.
Hard to compare two different systems, but we definitely need to become a harder team to play against, no matter what system.
I think Bergevin is aiming for more of the Chicago style than the LA style. Less big grinders and more speed.
If the window opens next year then look at buying next deadline. The only core player that is older is Markov and he doesn't seem to be slowing down.
I think next year Tinordi will definitely graduate(no way they lose him on waivers). Then Scherbak and McCarron will play pro along with Gregoire. DLR will have a year and a half under his belt. I think once those guys have a half year AHL we will have a pretty good idea of where the franchise is in terms of contending. McCarron given his size and mobility will be an interesting study as he could play a lesser role at 20-21 in the NHL and grow into something bigger like Lucic and others did.
Galchenyuk, is he a legit #1 C by then?
MB might make a lateral trade(a hockey trade) or trade a pick/B prospect for a rental, I don't expect any top prospects moved or high picks.
The trade for Vanek was so-so. It helped through the PO 2nd round but not in the 3rd. It was a short-term rental, nothing more. I'd say Bergevin's best trade last season was for Weise.
Even though he flopped at playoff time it was a good trade for boosting the offense down the stretch and giving depth to the offense. He went 6-9-15 in 18 games and allowed Gallagher to go help Pleky plus allow Gionta to help kick start Eller's season. For the price it was a good deal...would have been a home run and he showed up more at playoff time(not just points but compete level).
The reason the Vanek trade was so good is because he bought bargain bin cheap.
Who knew that Vanek would flop hoard....
He flopped at playoff time, but was very good during the season. n68 point pace here.
Whoever they get it'll be the one you least suspect.
Welcome Crosby.
I can't see MB not landing Jagr though. He needs us, we need him...it's been speculated for so long. Get your butt over here, Jaromir.
As long as the price makes sense it could work...though he is slloowww and has struggled at playoff time. Plus he sort of burned a bridge with MB in the past.
Honestly I see something like Blake Wheeler to the Habs....
A move out of left field that no one expects...
Or one of the pieces on SJ...
Why would Winnipeg trade a core guy? Maybe if they have value on Emelin? Plus add a good but not great prospect? Emelin-Fucale?
trading assets for Blake Wheeler would be a mistake, a winger at 6'5 and 225 pounds doesn't have a high career span. There is so many examples of 6'5 forward that had their career slow down from 30 years old and up. There's maybe 2 or 3 good years left with Wheeler and that's it, and like Bergevin said many times, you build a championship team through your organisation, not by looking for players in other teams.
We have to build before thinking of going after other players through trades or free agency. The Habs are still in the building process.
Agreed, unless the price was too good to pass up(didn't touch the core).
Key free agent signings will likely be the way he does this.
Though I am sure he is looking at upgrading the defense by the deadline.
Might be hard, free agent crop is weak for 2015.