What is to be learned from White? He had 41 pts in what was really his rookie season. He had injuries. a sophomore slump, and was I believe on a pt a game clip over the last 15 games or so. If he doesn't break out this year (assuming the coach gives him a chance) then the contract is bad.
But if he returns to rookie form at 40 pts, is his contract still bad? Will underperforming on the second year of his contract really make his contract a huge anchor for Ottawa?
I don't think anyone expected White to evolve into a 50 pt two way force the first year of his contract new contract/sophomore NHL season. Kid's got another year where I'd expect around 30-40pts two-way guy for him to be par for the course, while anything over is a good deal . This is also in context of Ottawa likely being in the lower end of the league for offensive output (24OA last year) whereas his rookie season had us as an average offensive team (15OA).
Players dont sign long term deals where they're underpaid most of the term. Especially when you don't bridge them, you're lkely to be overpaying them based on their development curve the first couple of years , while hoping to reap the benefits when they peak the tail half of the contract with your team is at its most competitive, giving you cap space to sign additional talent. It's why elite guys go for a 2-year bridge a la Subban to bet on themselves for a big 60+ mil contract, vs teams betting on them a la Karlsson being underpaid his first 5 years of his contract, before fairly being paid (or underpaid) at year 6+.
Another example is Jeff Skinner who signed at 5.725 mil x 6 years after a 60 pt and 50 pt season on his first 2 ELC years. Team bet on him breaking out into a consistent 60-70 pt player, where he's been a 50-60 pt at his best, in the latter half of his contract, while being a 30-50 pt player in the first 3 years.