Looking at the above image, Iginla is at the top of the screen and in the normal, correct spot for a winger in the defensive zone. He’s up near the blueline, guarding the defender. In fact, there are actually two player’s up at the blueline. While both aren’t his, at least one of them would be in a “normal” defensive coverage scheme.
Cliché is guarding his man in front and doing a decent job of it. Barrie is stuck right on his man’s hip, also doing a good job (this is some evidence of Roy’s hybrid man-to-man system as you rarely see a defender float that high up in the defensive zone in a normal system). That leaves McGinn and Guenin standing in the slot, not covering anyone.
So, based on Roy’s comments he wants Iginla to step up and try and defend Fowler in this situation? Ok, say he does that. With Barrie rotating to his left and therefore unavailable, that would leave a simple and soft little pass for Fowler to make back to the point, leaving two Ducks completely unguarded and holding the puck. While McGinn and Guenin would then at least be in the shooting lane, it’s still not the ideal solution based on most defensive systems. This is yet another example of how Roy’s mindset defensively is to have a system that is basically man-to-man with constant rotation, staying in the shooting lanes as much as possible.
Personally, I think Guenin should be the one to step into the circle to try and defend Fowler in this case. Charge straight to the dot, using your stick in your left hand to take away a play to the middle of the ice, force Fowler down closer to the corner. His only options then would be to either shoot from a tough angle or hold onto the puck. Instead Guenin stands there and watches Fowler walk straight to the middle of the ice, attempting a weak slash on him and not moving his feet.
I really don’t understand how Patrick Roy, as an NHL coach, can point the finger at Jarome Iginla on this play. To me it shows that his style of a defensive system is flawed and is in all reality the reason why Colorado continues to flail away both in the standings and in their puck possession numbers. Plays like this aren’t exactly rare for this team. And not only that, I think a play like this is piece of evidence #5001 that Nate Guenin is not an NHL defenceman.