I personally like Riikola but I heard something from Sully today that really caught my attention. He said "Pets is not a guy who just fires it off the glass and out and we need that vision on our defense." And I think that's what he hates about Riikola. Riiko is a simple player. I like his skillset. But I think Sully does not.
Is Riikola guilty of doing that to the point it's a problem? I personally don't think he does it any more than anyone else. Just a game or two ago he took hit after hit to keep from turning the puck over since nothing was there. I think you yourself even mentioned it.
From what I get (when I glue my eyes to him to see how he's doing) I notice him do that if the F core can't get open or the line is wiped out tired or repeated failed attempts at breaking out. And that would be good vision - alleviating pressure.
***
Last Riikola post because I'm not this die hard Riikola guy. My entire point is he's under valued and I think your right, Sully is not fond of him. If it really is for his 'vision' I think that is a bull shit cop out from MS.
Oh... I don't think Sully would pair him up with tang either if his vision was an issue.
I'm stubborn in that I think they just don't play him a lot so his value won't shoot up because he is a great depth guy. If plays a lot and does well he's gone... one less (cheap) depth guy.