2 things you said in the GDT:
1) Murray was a "barely good" goaltender.
2) Wilson owns the Penguins.
It's bad enough to have one of those as your opinion. Together - that is mighty impressive. I would honestly believe you may be Tom Wilson.
okay, so i'm going to explain myself in a very lengthy post because you seem to enjoy laughing at my posts in general and would rather spend your energy making passive-aggressive jabs at me and anyone else here who isn't marching in lockstep with you.
when i say "barely good", ESPECIALLY in quotes, i don't mean he's a horrendous goaltender, i don't mean him winning games is a fluke, i don't even mean he's average. i mean he's a good goaltender who seems to get beat with the weirdest stuff. the best way i could describe it in detail is that he seems to let the odd shot get through, and usually it's a pattern for that game or stretch of games. sometimes it's the glove hand, sometimes it's through the blocker, etc.
it's more of a comment on how he seems to have some odd mistakes at the worst times. he can still win games (he won tonight, didn't he?) but it's frustrating to me that i seem to see these odd little mistakes more often than not. so i made the comment that i'd describe him as "barely good". i don't consider him elite. i consider him great some nights and bad other nights (mostly bad this season, but there are a lot of reasons why that is).
instead of questioning the term i used, you took it as an opportunity to throw some passive-aggressive jabs that are painting your opinion as "obviously correct" and mine as "obviously incorrect". by that, i mean you phrase it as "WHAT WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE??!! I WILL TAKE THE GOALIE WITH SEVERAL CUPS" because the Cups he helped them win three years ago are supposed to have bearing on how he's playing in the current moment, i guess?
and the Wilson comment, i'll admit, that's out of frustration. pure frustration. i'm not a fan of seeing him body the Pens players and injure them. the Pens got the last laugh and won, so whatever, i'm "silly" for getting bent out of shape over it. that's one of the biggest things i've seen about the main stays at this message board, you're not allowed to be an informed hockey fan AND value physical play from your favorite team's players. you're either a caveman or you don't actually want your team to win games, which is absurd to me.
i used to catch a ton of garbage here when i was voicing my support for Reaves. the only opinion that seemed "allowed" was that he was a drudge on the game of hockey and ultimately made it worse. i thought he had value. but it's not okay to think he has value.
i dunno, i feel like around here it's not enough to simply disagree with someone. the trend seems to be gravitating toward "oh such and such group doesn't know what they're talking about" or "*laughing emojis* look at this nonsense".