Ok, so you know-it-all Mr. Muikeabulju know of course better how things should be in these kind of cases than generally approved liability definition through most legal systems and the world wide approved systems for defining liability and covering for it through according insurances or negotiations? Ok, you go on by all means and keep on making a fool of your self...You seem to have absolutely zero understanding on what the conversation is about. Legal liability can be defined in any way any legal system wants to define it.
What I claim is that who should be responsible, not who will be given some punishments in some jurisdiction.
What we have is yet another case of you showing off your complete illiteracy.
Anyone with even primitive level of reading comprehension would have understood what I was after in these posts:
" Should car companies be liable if someone drives drunk or goes twice the speed limit, and kills a bunch of people? I dont think so."
" If I go to someone's place, and someone else there misuses a device / does not follow instructions, how is it the owner's fault? "
Last edited: