Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
You don't math so good....Now down to 6.5m in cap space. How much will kerfoot cost?
You don't math so good....Now down to 6.5m in cap space. How much will kerfoot cost?
Leafs are doing a smart move here. They've agreed to the deal but appear to be waiting to make it official. Gives them more cap flexibility.
Leafs need a RD. Even if Ceci is a bottom pairing RD, that's 2.5-3.5 on the open market. They overpaid to facilitate the trade and also put themselves in a scenario where Ceci will be off the books next year if needed. There aren't many veteran RDs available with 1 year of term or who would sign for 1 year.
Ceci is not the top pairing defenceman he has been deployed as, but he also isn't as bad as the advanced stats paint him. He is a 4-5 who struggled as a 1-2 shutdown guy.
2 + 2 = Jello?Now down to 6.5m in cap space. How much will kerfoot cost?
Why has he not signed yet? Are they going to flip him?
Er... how? CapFriendly lists them at $11.1m in space. Even if they were to sign Ceci for $4.5m that would leave them way more to spend then $6.6m for the following reasons:Now down to 6.5m in cap space. How much will kerfoot cost?
Not so fast, for example
To Toronto
Faulk
2nd round pick
To Carolina
Nylander
Toronto now has about 3.7 million in cap savings and can possibly offer someone like Ferland a 4 yr x 4 mil
So Dreger was wrong, again.He's electing to go to arbitration, it seems. Thread title is inaccurate.
They talked about it on the Steve Dangle Podcast.Why has he not signed yet? Are they going to flip him?
I'm curious, if he doesn't go to arbitration (since the rules change), even though he has a QO. Could the Leafs offer him a 3-yr/$8 M salary (3.66 AAV) and could he accept it? Or is he limited to just the QO?
Why don't the leafs walk away from the arbitration award if it's above the 4.4 threshold? Take the cap savings and look into upgrading the 3 c (Eakin). Or circle back on gards. I'd rather walk than pay ceci 4. 5 for any number of years
Toronto can offer any sort of contract to Ceci that they want, and Ceci is free to negotiate in return. The qualifying offer doesn’t restrict teams and players from negotiating a different deal.
What's to stop a team (and I'm not saying Toronto, but any team) to suggest to a player to take more money in 2 or 3 years to lower an AAV then take 1 larger QO and be told you'll be the odd man out, and thus hurting your value the following offseason?
Using Ceci here, He can get 1-year/$4.5-4.7 and maybe he plays #7 or gets shipped to the Marlies.
Or he signs a 3-year/$9M deal, and maybe plays.
I don't know of anyone signing something like that, but it seems logical (at sometime or another) for both parties, does it not?
What do you mean by binding arbitration?It was binding arbitration. No walking away.
It was always set in stone he was making this $ when he was traded. The sens qualified him before and binding arb was set.
So many people so ill informed.
Oh god why?
You just got rid of Zaitsev. Why create another?
Absolutely, we’ve seen some examples of players taking less then the QO for security. The question comes back to what is Ceci’s value on the UFA market? He’s certainly maligned here on the forums for the most part, but what do GM’s actually think of him?
Has there been any reports that contradict this one year agreement?
I don't get why people would be surprised that it hasn't signed yet. Leafs still have moving parts to deal with. I'm not suggesting they will go back on a verbal agreement with Ceci, only that waiting to make the contract official until as late as possible gives them more flexibility since it leaves an additional 4.5M open.
What do you mean by binding arbitration?
The Leafs currently have just over 11 million in cap space and that's without having Horton on LTIR so realistically they have about 16 million