He was our best defenceman this season by a considerable margin. He made considerable progress and was one of the highest goal scoring D in the league.
I think they are all fine as of today. I expect all to take another jump next year. It's the crappy salary and cap hits of the vets that are doing us in. We have a year to upgrade our D and change the mix of the forwards. A savvy GM should be able to do that.I hope JC the clairvoyant is right on any of the DVO/Chych/Keller/Schmaltz contracts. It looks like we over paid on all of them so far based on performance. I know there have been injuries, these guys are young, blame their line mates, blame RT, etc... But, that is all part of the total package and risk you take. I would have waited and done more bridge type deals. The bridge deal does 2 things, it keeps them motivated and you find out who deserves the money and who doesn't. Now I'm not an analytical guru like JC, so i can't accurately predict the future like he can, but thats the way I would have done it
Injuries played a part earlier in his career and last year he missed 7 games, so that is always a concern but he is definitely better than a third line D and that there is no argument. In fact, some were saying he was our best D for most part of the year, all at the age of 22, and if I'm not mistaken, didn't you say he was a 1D? Pretty damn good if you ask me.No he is not, he has been injured constantly and a 2nd/third line D man. I like his progress but his injuries make that contract questionable so far.
Tied for 11th, 60th in pts. A solid 2nd pairing.He was our best defenceman this season by a considerable margin. He made considerable progress and was one of the highest goal scoring D in the league.
60th in points would be barely second pairing, his D is borderline second pairing. Demers/OEL/Goose were all better in the D zone, and slightly better overall. Chych was second or third pairing for the year mostly because of his D play not being good enough. I like Chych as a player and think he will be better next year, but he's not a first pairing D yet, he is a 4D on most teams. My point was his contract isn't a bargain so far, especially given his injuries, all I am saying.Tied for 11th, 60th in pts. A solid 2nd pairing.
If points were the only determining factor of where you play in the lineup, he'd be borderline 1st pairing, no? Now I agree he's not quite there yet due to his D play isn't fully matured, but he definitely has that potential.60th in points would be barely second pairing