If you have Lindholm as physical, you should really have Silfverberg, but really I'm not sure I would have either. Lindholm really isn't that physical, especially when you consider the position he's playing(defensemen are generally going to be more physical, on average, than a forward). Lindholm seems to be listed as physical primarily because he's a big body who battles.
I'd also say Vatanen is physical. He tries to engage players at pretty much every opportunity. He just lacks the size to do it effectively. I'd call him physical for many of the season reasons that I wouldn't list Lindholm. Vatanen goes out of his way to be physical, but he doesn't really have the tools for it. Lindholm has the tools, but he doesn't use them enough. Toughness, probably not, but he hasn't had much occasion and it just isn't his game. He's fearless though.
I also agree with Sauced that it's a little bit of a head scratcher to not have Getzlaf as physical, especially when you've got someone like Lindholm listed.
Also, Cogliano is both tough and physical. He's just in the same physical category as someone like Vatanen. He engages players physically all the time, and he never hesitates to lay the body. He just doesn't have the tools to really do much.
I'd also have Corey Perry in his own category of tough and physical. He engages players physically, and he takes a beating out there on the ice and doesn't miss a beat, but he does it in a decidedly Corey Perry-like fashion. I don't think of him as traditionally tough or physical, but it's hard to deny that he is both of those things, in his own way. I think saying he isn't tough, or physical, is doing the guy a disservice, when you consider how much punishment he takes to play the way he does.
Just my opinion, on some of those names.