Hi ImHFNYR
Registered User
A lot of hate in this thread with not a lot of evidence..
Over 200 games worth of evidence. Not saying all of the analysis is perfectly spot on but there's certainly a lot of evidence that we've all seen. When we've all seen the same games and the same issues with consistency it isn't necessary to backup every analysis with a ton of evidence.
Any idea of getting rid of him is foolish imo just in case you're wondering. Though he certainly has the talent to take over shifts and dominate, he just does so way too infrequently for what we'd like. he has too many games where he does nothing major for the entire game. Can you give me an idea of which posts should have featured more evidence? I could imagine people saying straight up falsehoods and not backing them up. I just didn't notice any