OT: Chess: Part Two

Elvis P

Night Gallery
Dec 10, 2007
24,152
5,785
ATL
Wow. Just wow...

@ORRFForever That's crazy. If you recognize speed chess as legitimate (idk if old timers such as Kasparov do), Naka may be the best all-around non-WC player ever. Now the story below has happened also. What if being scanned is against his personal beliefs?

1700596257300.png

 

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
@ORRFForever That's crazy. If you recognize speed chess as legitimate (idk if old timers such as Kasparov do), Naka may be the best all-around non-WC player ever. Now the story below has happened also. What if being scanned is against his personal beliefs?


He doubles down...

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
Yeah the cheating accusations are getting out of hand and devolving into full fledged paranoia. Thanks, Hans.
Chess players tend to be paranoid at the best of times so...

I remember a player accusing another player of cheating at a tournament I played in. He said the player, while there were ~20 pieces still on the board, went for a walk (it was not his move), entered all of the pieces into an engine on his phone, and came back with the best move.

To remember where all 20 pieces are, mid way thru a game, is NOT easy so the tournament director did not buy it... but it is possible.

P.S. Don't blame Hans, blame...

1700671045824.png
 

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
View attachment 771638

Rd3 was....terrible. dont know what i was thinking.
Good comeback, my friend.

Yes, the Rook lift to d3 (move 18) was bad - too early plus it ended up being pinned. So was c5 (move 23) - as noted by the engine.

My own personal notes :

1) I did NOT like (8 d5) - keeping the pawn on d4 with the tension would have been better.

2) (11 dxc6) was not good. Always exchange towards the center - not the other way around.

3) h3 at some point early to prevent Bg4 would have helped.

4) Your last 6 moves were spectacular - albeit a little lucky. ;)

Well done.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P
Nov 5, 2007
2,744
383
Jersey City
Good comeback, my friend.

Yes, the Rook lift to d3 (move 18) was bad - too early plus it ended up being pinned. So was c5 (move 23) - as noted by the engine.

My own personal notes :

1) I did NOT like (8 d5) - keeping the pawn on d4 with the tension would have been better.

2) (11 dxc6) was not good. Always exchange towards the center - not the other way around.

3) h3 at some point early to prevent Bg4 would have helped.

4) Your last 6 moves were spectacular - albeit a little lucky. ;)

Well done.
Thanks for the tips. During middlegames I feel like if the weakness isnt obvious to me i just end up attacking random pieces, or the right piece but the wrong way etc. But I saw the weakness at the end and thought best bet is to throw my pieces at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
Thanks for the tips. During middlegames I feel like if the weakness isnt obvious to me i just end up attacking random pieces, or the right piece but the wrong way etc. But I saw the weakness at the end and thought best bet is to throw my pieces at it.
Re : " I saw the weakness at the end and thought best bet is to throw my pieces at it."

The attack was really well done - and just in the nick of time. It's nice when a plan comes together.

I thought 28 Bc1 was your best move - it wasn't obvious. 28 was clever.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Elvis P

Elvis P

Night Gallery
Dec 10, 2007
24,152
5,785
ATL



 

Elvis P

Night Gallery
Dec 10, 2007
24,152
5,785
ATL



 

Elvis P

Night Gallery
Dec 10, 2007
24,152
5,785
ATL

"As for So, a rest day dashes his chances of playing for first in the event, but qualification for the 2024 Candidates tournament is still a possibility via FIDE Circuit points if he is able to finish in the top two, something GM Anish Giri will be hell-bent on stopping in order to boost his claim for his own spot".
 

Elvis P

Night Gallery
Dec 10, 2007
24,152
5,785
ATL

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
@ORRFForever He compared himself to Fischer.
Oy.

I don't know what to think about this kid. He's an arrogant ass - but, then again, we were all arrogant asses at 20.

I still believe he's doing "something" to give himself an unfair advantage. How he's doing it, I don't know - again, I don't believe in "Dildo Gate". He just seems so shifty and his game is all over the map - sometimes he plays badly and other times he plays like the heir apparent to the throne.

I just don't know, W.E.. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
@ORRFForever You were right. He's too good sometimes. This might sound uneducated but I've never met a very intelligent person that resembles him in any way. It's such a soap opera.
On "X", Hans wrote :

"Unbothered, Unfazed, Undaunted

Chess is speaking and will always speak for itself"

Oy. Either he's a genius or he's cheating and he will continue cheating until he is caught. Again... Oy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P

Elvis P

Night Gallery
Dec 10, 2007
24,152
5,785
ATL
@ORRFForever, I thought it may be interesting to see which of the top WCs ever has the highest winning %s. It doesn't prove anything about who's best but it's interesting. I think chess.com ranking Kramnik 7th and leaving Petrosian and Anand out of the top 10 is dumb. It has nothing to do with winning%, Tigran was just better than Vlad and Anand tied Vlad in career matches 11 to 11, with 74 draws. I think @Harbour Dog is a Petrosian fan also.

83.8 - Morphy - Only 457 games.
73.8 - Alekhine
73.5 - Capablanca
73.4 - Lasker
72.5 - Fischer
69.5 - Kasparov
68.2 - Botvinnik
65.2 - Tal
65 - Karpov
64.3 - Petrosian - 2073 games.
63.1 - Carlsen
61.2 - Kramnik - 3246 games.
59.9 - Anand - 3996 games.
 

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
This might sound uneducated but I've never met a very intelligent person that resembles him in any way.
It does not sound uneducated.

TBH, I have met chess players like him.

@ORRFForever, I thought it may be interesting to see which of the top WCs ever has the highest winning %s. It doesn't prove anything about who's best but it's interesting. I think chess.com ranking Kramnik 7th and leaving Petrosian and Anand out of the top 10 is dumb. It has nothing to do with winning%, Tigran was just better than Vlad and Anand tied Vlad in career matches 11 to 11, with 74 draws. I think @Harbour Dog is a Petrosian fan also.

83.8 - Morphy - Only 457 games.
73.8 - Alekhine
73.5 - Capablanca
73.4 - Lasker
72.5 - Fischer
69.5 - Kasparov
68.2 - Botvinnik
65.2 - Tal
65 - Karpov
64.3 - Petrosian - 2073 games.
63.1 - Carlsen
61.2 - Kramnik - 3246 games.
59.9 - Anand - 3996 games.
Wow. That is crazy. Of course, it depends on the level of the competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
18,704
10,111
Hans' behaviour reminds me of Lance Armstrong. He is so arrogant, I truly have NO idea what to make of him.

Is he being arrogant because he's innocent (would you be arrogant, humble or dismissive if you were innocent?) or is he acting like Lance Armstrong did when he knew he was cheating and felt no one could touch him or prove it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elvis P

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad