Robb_K
Registered User
Consistent with Tarasenko being pulled down earlier, and no call then, either.So wait, Schenn gets run over and no call?
Consistent with Tarasenko being pulled down earlier, and no call then, either.So wait, Schenn gets run over and no call?
The D core IS fine. They are simply playing lousy defence right now, as are the forwards. That's more on Yeo and Van Ryn than on Pietrangelo, Edmundson, and Parayko. Although all 3 should be trying to play harder and smarter on their own. Dunn is playing poorly, and so is Bouwmeester, at times. Schmaltz has been both good and bad. But, I thing the top 6 are okay. They just need to play a different system. I don't like whay Yeo and Van Ryn have them doing. And there had better be a change very soon.
That's my biggest complaint about Yeo and Van Ryn (along with so few minutes for Kyrou and Thomas). I've never liked Yeo's work with this team. I hope he's gone soon (Davis Payne treatment).I think we need a fundamentals coach. Start with a defense first system, one that emphasises working as a 5 man unit and stresses communication. Once that is established, (and it may take a while and bruise some egos!) THEN you start on offensive plays and creativity. We have the talent, it just needs to be made to work as a team. No more individual efforts.
He was playing poker in the press box and made some pretty bad calls.Dunn was one of the best Blues in game 1 and was still fine in game 2. Have you seen him play poorly since then?
His play has been inconsistent on defence since Game 1, from what I remember. He's made several good plays, but also some judgement errors that led to defensive breakdowns. He's still young and that's to be expected. he'd be looking a lot better if The Blues were playing a tighter system, and the forwards and defencemen were more coordinated (smaller gaps and switching, instead of trying to fight through picks to play man on man when that isn't practical). The Blues have played better team defence with this same entire corps of defencemen, and forwards of similar defensive skill. It seems to me that the problem is more what their coaches are trying to get them to do.Dunn was one of the best Blues in game 1 and was still fine in game 2. Have you seen him play poorly since then?
Davis Payne was relieved of duty after a very small amount of games, and The Blues' record was really not all that bad, and they hadn't dropped out of the playoff race. I think it's possible that D. Armstrong could decide that Yeo is not looking like he's going to fix the overall team defensive problem, and he's not the right man to coach this roster.I think coaching looks like a problem. But I think it’s unrealistic that Armstrong would really make a change any time soon, especially if they’re playing .500 points hockey and still in the playoff hunt st that point. Fans can talk about it a lot, but I think this is fanciful thinking right now.
I hope you’re right, but I think the circumstances were a lot different. Armstrong has not hired Payne, amd I think the availability of Hitchcock has more to do with acting more quickly.Davis Payne was relieved of duty after a very small amount of games, and The Blues' record was really not all that bad, and they hadn't dropped out of the playoff race. I think it's possible that D. Armstrong could decide that Yeo is not looking like he's going to fix the overall team defensive problem, and he's not the right man to coach this roster.
He currently has a pretty good gig with the NJ organization. Executive director of business development, or something like that. I doubt he's available.If the Blues had to work with what they had to replace Yeo, what about someone like Brodeur as coach?
Aren't both Vigneault and Tippett available?I hope you’re right, but I think the circumstances were a lot different. Armstrong has not hired Payne, amd I think the availability of Hitchcock has more to do with acting more quickly.
I don’t think a ‘shake up’ trade is possible with the cap situation.
Is there a coach Armstrong trusts like Hitchcock who is out there available? Tippetts is the only one that I’d guess might be in that category.
Tippet is not technically. He was hired by the NHL Seattle group as a consultant.Aren't both Vigneult and Tippett available?
Not good. He'd have been my first choice.Tippet is not technically. He was hired by the NHL Seattle group as a consultant.
I noticed multiple instances where he looked for any support from Tarasenko but there never was any. He's great at cycling the puck and opening up the ice with O'Reilly but Tarasenko has just been piss poor this season. I would like to see Tarasenko and Perron switch spots until Fabbri is able to take over for Maroon. Fully healthy I would like to seeThoughts on Maroon so far? I'm unimpressed.
I haven't been following the box scores - have the Hawks been putting up a ton of goals each game or do Toews/Kane/Debrincat have all of their goals?
Blais has been noticeably better than Thomas thus far. Tonight and the other 3 games.
Schenn is a beast
Perron played well
Allen kept us in the game
Tarasenko, ROR, Maroon line is a liability defensively...mainly due to the wingers
Defense plays so soft/backs way too far away from any puck handler
We have to be the slowest team in the NHL...painfully slow
AgreedI'd love AV, his fast and relentless style is what this team needs.
That's no surprise though, Thomas and Kyrou clearly have the talent to be top 6 players in the future. They have higher upside than Blais and always have.IMO, I have yet to see a play by Blais that makes me say wow, even with a lot of ice time. Thomas by contrast, even with so few minutes, always seems on the edge of impressing (as is kyrou). It also is clear that Thomas is one of the few Blues who can consistently see and execute a great tape to tape pass. There really is no argument for bringing him along slowly, as the third line vets look generally unimpressive and the team isn’t playing well. Might as well give the kid more time bc he possesses a skil set that few of our players have. In sum, Yeo is bungling the entire affair.
I agree and that’s my point. We are giving more time to a guy who might at best be a fringe third liner and not giving time to a guy who seems labeled for at least a second line or perhaps first line position. We need to develop him now as we aren’t playing all that well with the current system and we pretty much are going all in for the next 2-4 years.That's no surprise though, Thomas and Kyrou clearly have the talent to be top 6 players in the future. They have higher upside than Blais and always have.
I doubt Blais ever becomes a top 6 player tbh. I think he could be a 3rd liner though, which is perfectly fine considering he was a 6th round pick.
So, I'm not really expecting Blais to "wow" me. I do like his physical play though as a 4th liner right now, and he has the ability to chip in some offense down there. His play is a little erratic at times though so there's certainly room for improvement.
Oh my bad I should have read that more clearly. Yeah I agree then. I don't understand Thomas consistently getting 8 minutes or under. He managed the 4th line awful once again last night.I agree and that’s my point. We are giving more time to a guy who might at best be a fringe third liner and not giving time to a guy who seems labeled for at least a second line or perhaps first line position. We need to develop him now as we aren’t playing all that well with the current system and we pretty much are going all in for the next 2-4 years.