MarkGio
Registered User
- Nov 6, 2010
- 12,533
- 11
Burke's philosophy on stats are making headlines again:
http://m.tsn.ca/home/article?url=ht....xml&itemId=445910&pageName=Home&feedId=82010
http://m.tsn.ca/home/article?url=ht....xml&itemId=445910&pageName=Home&feedId=82010
Burke started to acknowledge, "Statistics have value; ignore at your peril," he said, before getting back on familiar ground, "But it's an eyeballs business." It's understandable when anyone has been in the business for so long that they aren't inclined to jump in at new methods of analysis, but Steven Burtch had a good take on the tendency to rely on eyeballs.
It's been said more than a few times, that use of analytics doesn't guarantee anything, which is an odd standard to apply since not using analytics and sticking with eyeballs, hunches and gut instinct most certainly doesn't come with any guarantees of success either.
The funny thing about using analytics is that, somehow -- likely through the famous scene with the scouts around the table in the movie Moneyball -- there persists the idea that anyone wants to use analytics without actually watching players play.