Wee Baby Seamus
Yo, Goober, where's the meat?
if a linesman has to flag faster than that for it to be considered legitimate, there will never be any flags ever lol
GWT: Champions League - Round of 16
- Thread starter bluesfan94
- Start date
Was never the point, but that's another one you missed.
That was offside then? Just wondering.
bluesfan94
Registered User
The most confusion around a blatant offside since Ten Hag couldn't figure out the rule against Arsenal.
hatterson
Registered User
The linesman is beginning to raise his flag in literally the same second on the clock that the keeper is calling for offside which was 1 second after the goal went in the net.
The ball goes in the net at 1:36. The keeper puts his hands up at 1:37. The linesman starts raising his flag before it ticks to 1:38.
Not sure why you're so hung up on this, but my point still stands. The linesman called offside after Real players (here the goalie) asked for it. It's a fact.
There's a lot of blatant here indeed.
hatterson
Registered User
lol. The universal "why are you so hung up on this" after being definitively proven wrong. Classic technique.
bluesfan94
Registered User
I find it suspicious that the linesman didn't have his flag up at 1:35 personally.
Sorry, are you kidding YOU JUST ADMITTED I WAS RIGHT.
As in FACT.
Lol some people really deserve each other.
Have fun boys ! Double, triple standards for the win !
As long as it fits !
hatterson
Registered User
You stated the linesman raised his flag after the keeper and other players asked for offside.
I said that the flag went up live quickly as an argument against it being raised in response to the players.
You then stated that it went up "WAY after" and "well after"
I showed it was being raised within, at most, a second of the real players putting their hands up and within, at most, 2 seconds of the goal being scored.
If you'd like to feel you're taking a W on that, be my guest.
Oh and damn refs being idiots compared to HFboards pundits :
End result? You say I'm proven wrong.
Loading…
x.com
I said he lifted his flag after the keeper. By your own admission he did.
End result? You say I'm proven wrong.
Wee Baby Seamus
Yo, Goober, where's the meat?
this ref is saying he doesn't think it's interference (which is subjective and a reasonable take)
your take has moved about 18 different directions but is basically summed up in "it was ruled out for a foul" (it wasn't) and "the ref flagged in response to Lunin waving" (he didn't)
hatterson
Registered User
Yea I'd probably land on the side of it not being called interfering in play myself, but it's not a clear and obvious error to say that bumping into the back of the keeper counts as being active in play.
The ref was trash today, it makes way more sense to talk about him being trash for the really bad calls he made (the Carvajal foul in the first half, multiple missed yellows for stopping counters, etc.) than to complain about the 50/50 ish (or 60/50 or 75/25 or whatever) call that his assistant may have gotten wrong.
Scandale du Jour
JordanStaal#1Fan
The last two Tweets you posted are from... Barca accountsOh and damn refs being idiots compared to HFboards pundits :
Loading…
x.com
I said he lifted his flag after the keeper. By your own admission he did.
End result? You say I'm proven wrong.
Hfboards pundits :
No foul, Donna had to throw the ball earlier !
Also HFboards pundits :
Heinrichs "bumps" in the goalie and as such interfers with the play, preventing Lunin from making a good play at the ball. 50/50 ! No goal !
Yup, yup, yup.
Lahoz, the known Real darling ref is also a Barca fan I'm guessing?
Loading…
x.com
Also HFboards pundits :
Loading…
x.com
Yup, yup, yup.
Not sure how relevant it is but OK.The last two Tweets you posted are from... Barca accounts
Lahoz, the known Real darling ref is also a Barca fan I'm guessing?
PeteWorrell
[...]
- Aug 31, 2006
- 4,782
- 1,984
It feels like me being a mad scientist in Football Manager and training players into new positions.
Spring in Fialta
A malign star kept him
I love how you act exasperated when you're the one who came in blowing up this whole thing. Typical.
bluesfan94
Registered User
Donnarumma had the ball at his feet and therefore couldn't throw it. Ignoring that FACT (am I doing it right?), looking back at the GDT, you described it as a "Donna mistake" rather than a foul. In that same thread, there was no discussion of it being a foul other than from @Peen who said it was probably a foul after seeing the replay but thought it was a 50/50 call.
Stop pulling shit out of your ass. It isn't impressive or convincing.
Scandale du Jour
JordanStaal#1Fan
Another Barca account
---
Madrid aggregator also posting that quote. Still super funny that you use a Barca fanboy tweet.
Last edited:
gary69
Registered User
I don't really care for either way and complaining about refs has been pretty much futile for ever, but based on this clip, I can see why this was unacceptable.
I still don't like VAR and how it is implemented. Checking for red cards is fine, but everything else is excessive, especially using for judging offsides, IMO. Goalline technology is sufficient..
I still don't like VAR and how it is implemented. Checking for red cards is fine, but everything else is excessive, especially using for judging offsides, IMO. Goalline technology is sufficient..
Wee Baby Seamus
Yo, Goober, where's the meat?
all VAR did here was confirm an on-field call, so I don't know why there's so much VAR discourse going on about this
bluesfan94
Registered User
Yeah, I didn't think it was controversial that pushing a goalie in the back while being in an offside position is considered interfering with the play. Would Lunin have recovered to a position where he could have made the save, who knows, but he was clearly interfered with by an offside player.
gary69
Registered User
Surprising that Beraldo starts for PSG at LB, his CL debut. Captain Oyarzabal missing for Sociedad could be a big loss for them.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
BET ON ONLY ONE HORSE WATCH LIVE - WOODBINE RACE 8 - TorontoWagers: 1Staked: $100.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
-
