hisgirlfriday
Moderator
- Jun 9, 2013
- 16,742
- 184
I absolutely give them credit for having a good team, and have never done otherwise. I take exception to the Wild being an "afterthought" last playoffs, when they absolutely weren't is all. The Wild were giving the Hawks all they could handle last year in the 2nd round, then Kane bailed you guys out almost singlehandedly (such a clutch playoff performer).
The Wild were an afterthought last playoffs. I'm sorry to break this to you but they were. No one was afraid of the Wild. No one expected them to make or win the Stanley Cup except optimistic Wild fans. They are not such an afterthought THIS year if this is any consolation to you.
But that they were an afterthought last year was a big reason the games were as tight as they were. The Hawks invested a lot of emotion and energy into getting past the Blues the previous round and just kind of went through the motions against the Wild and had trouble getting up for the games in the same way. And like the other Hawks poster said upthread, Crawford had just as much to do with the Hawks beating the Wild as Kane did.
The Wild last year were certainly pesky and annoying but they were like a bad cold you took a little longer to get over than you would have liked, not anything you feared as if it could be a fatal illness to your Stanley Cup hopes.