Minny Lakes
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2013
- 763
- 0
Preds are getting their mojo back, on a three game win streak and currently winning 3-0 against the caps.
Lol the one team I'm definitely not worried about is Chicago...only if Kane is still out.
Lol the one team I'm definitely not worried about is Chicago...especially if Kane is still out.
The Wild dominate the hawks basically everytime we play them. (Last two games I think shots are like 90-45) They've beat us cuz our shakey goal-tending, but with Dub in the net I don't think Chicago even gets to 7 games against the Wild...
I'd be very worried if Kane plays. The man is a Wild killer. He's Mr. Clutch.
They also have Wild killer #2 in Bickell.
Just how were the Wild any more of an afterthought than the Blues?
This thread is eerily void of any Predator discussion. They are still on top of the Division.
The Wild have actually won a series....the Blues didn't. That makes the Blues more of the afterthought, wouldn't you think?
I'm not saying the Wild accomplished anything here, I'm just pointing out that the Blues haven't either.
All the Blues have done is proven they know how to play regular season hockey...nothing more.
Agreed...Chicago without Kane is nothing to fear...with Kane its a completely different story! Kane was THE reason Chicago won that series last year!
They sold their posts to Hawks fans so they didn't have to interact with them.
The Wild have actually won a series....the Blues didn't. That makes the Blues more of the afterthought, wouldn't you think?
I'm not saying the Wild accomplished anything here, I'm just pointing out that the Blues haven't either.
All the Blues have done is proven they know how to play regular season hockey...nothing more.
In the last two playoffs, the Blues lost a lot of OT games in the 1st round to the previous year's Stanley Cup champion who then advanced to the WCF. They were legitimate Stanley Cup contenders in those seasons despite falling early in the playoffs.
The Wild were never at any point perceived as legitimate Stanley Cup contenders the last two seasons. I'm not sure what's so hard to understand about this?
I'm not saying the Blues accomplished more. I'm saying they had a better team than the Wild did the past two seasons, because they did.
And if I, as someone who hates the Blues more than any other team, can give them this credit, why can't you?
all we want is to be feared. :'(
Discussing playoff accomplishments of any team that hasn't won the Cup is pointless, it's like discussing who failed better, at the end of the day you still failed.
The Wild isn't a team of great playoff success either and so far the 2 cores of these teams have both won 1 playoff series' against the Sharks and Avs, other teams not known for great recent playoff success.
The only series a fanbase should brag about winning is the Finals and the only other acceptable series wins that could be justified is if you knock of a big team like the Hawks or Kings, not Sharks or Avs.
I absolutely give them credit for having a good team, and have never done otherwise. I take exception to the Wild being an "afterthought" last playoffs, when they absolutely weren't is all. The Wild were giving the Hawks all they could handle last year in the 2nd round, then Kane bailed you guys out almost singlehandedly (such a clutch playoff performer).
Knocking the Blues for something and the talking highly of the Wild for the same thing just reeks of homerism.
For the record, my intent was not to knock any team, but to show that in the post season, both the Wild and Blues were on equal footing, because it was claimed that the Wild were a playoff afterthought last season while the Blues were not.
I think it's obvious that last season's playoffs, neither team was an afterthought, but both still fell victim to a quality Hawks team.