If it is about too many teams losing money then so be it. Even Ottawa, who is having a great season, and Nepean who went to FPC last year can not generate enough revenues to break even, something has to give, otherwise Junior A will start to lose teams. Based upon discussions I had with a couple of GM's I understand that the whole concept started up in discussions between the OJHL and CCHL presidents. The OJHL has the same issues and in some markets it does not matter whether you are successful or not. Hockey is an expensive sport and with the US leagues charging $5k plus the Ontario leagues are wondering why they can not charge more.
You certainly have some built up anger, got to think you have a personal connection somehow to those two teams..... So based upon your statement above it is only Gloucester reducing practice time not all 4 teams you mentioned previously.
Not sure how a bus is relevant. CP has their own bus because they also have it contracted out to a third party during the day. Kudos to CP finding a way to make it work but those opportunities are not available to all the teams. A team bus is not financially viable when you only use it once or twice a week, there are even Major Junior teams that do not own their own bus. Buses need a lot more use than what a hockey team uses it to even breakeven, purchase price and operating costs are huge. Most teams only need a bus for 8-10 trips per season since the various rinks are so close and the drive to your home rink is about the same as the drive to your opponents rinks for many of the players. Not sure a pull down screen with a projector is a "video board" but I do think the effort put forth is a good thing.
I am not a huge fan of parent ownership but if they are the only ones willing to put up the money then that is the way it is, not many people have $150 to $300k to invest in a hockey team. Brockville, Cornwall, Hawkesbury, Kemptville and Nepean all have some level of parent ownership, some have been successful and some have not.