- Feb 24, 2017
- 5,094
- 2,865
The guy has a 0.18 ppgor he tried to pivot quickly to counter the reverse stop n go and ate **** because kapanen was quicker and more agile.
Even on his ass Carlo had a better than 4/5 chance the play went nowhere
The guy has a 0.18 ppgor he tried to pivot quickly to counter the reverse stop n go and ate **** because kapanen was quicker and more agile.
Maybe Boston would take Gardiner in exchange being that he's already such a big playoff contributor for them
Someone had to
No deal that makes sense. Bruins move Carlo and their top need becomes finding another Carlo.
From what I just read McQuaid is the most likely to be traded. It is my strong belief that McAvoy, Carlo, Krug and Chara because of his age and NMC are the least likely to Traded
How does signing a bottom pair LD make a 2nd pair RD expendable?Let me preface this thread with a heartfelt apology for another "D to Toronto" thread but this one has kind of been burning a hole in my brain so I'm over it.
I still really do not understand why Boston signed John Moore, but here we are. I think the talk that they might trade Krug is nuts. Nonetheless they have 8 roster D with Zboril potentially knocking on the door soon.
Carlo would be a good fit as a shut down D for TO that fits the age core, and I get there's absolutely no hurry to move him, but with him, McAvoy, Donato and Heinen needing new deals this summer and DeBrusk and Krug next it could get a little dicey even with Chara and McQuaid off the books.
Anything realistic get it done from Toronto?
I'll let you think about why that would make no sense for the other team.Would never trade dermott for Carlo. Thats counterproductive. Johnsson neither.
Bracco? Brown? Prospect?
Trust me when I say there is no collaboration to all these threads. There is no round-table where Leaf fans get together and discuss the weekly agenda for how many different threads we collectively post to draw the ire of the main boards. Just a bunch of folks posting threads who really couldn't be bothered on how it reflects on "TOR fans".How does signing a bottom pair LD make a 2nd pair RD expendable?
Look, I totally get that TOR needs a top 4 RD, and maybe one will be available, but teams aren't looking to simply make deals to help out the Toronto Maple Leafs with their needs. Boston trading Carlo makes them worse an would make RD their #1 need after doing the deal. And I'm not even a big Carlo fan.
Maybe what TOR fans should do is make a thread asking teams what RD's are available and starting from there. Otherwise it just becomes "Josh Manson to TOR" and "Trouba to TOR" and "Carlo to TOR" et al.
Something around Dermott for Carlo?
I’d hate to lose Dermott, but Carlo is a rhd which is a bigger need
Or Johnsson/Brown And a Pick?
How does signing a bottom pair LD make a 2nd pair RD expendable?
Look, I totally get that TOR needs a top 4 RD, and maybe one will be available, but teams aren't looking to simply make deals to help out the Toronto Maple Leafs with their needs. Boston trading Carlo makes them worse an would make RD their #1 need after doing the deal. And I'm not even a big Carlo fan.
Maybe what TOR fans should do is make a thread asking teams what RD's are available and starting from there. Otherwise it just becomes "Josh Manson to TOR" and "Trouba to TOR" and "Carlo to TOR" et al.
I have no idea what you are talking about in regards to my post. I didn't mention Krug. I was talking about how signing Moore doesn't make Carlo expendable.As you probably already know Tory Krug is our Power play Quarterback which is hard to find, when his contract is up in 2 year the Bruins will have 5 million coming of the Salary cap from buyouts and salary retained. He is a very important player on the Bruins and I’m sure they will make sure he is resigned before hitting the free agent market. Sorry to burst your bubble but the Bruins Top three D is set for a very long time.
Is that really true.The Bruins have absolutely no reason to move Carlo, especially to a divisional rival, for a reasonable price so, no.
If we use that logic, Toronto is in trouble with their own defense.Having seen Toronto blow by carlo consistently, I think we'll pass.
Is that really true.
The bruins are in an interesting place. The have a few aging players that they are finding replacements for, but they will have to make decisions next year for cap reasons. I understand the reluctance of moving Carlo but the contracts next year could get ugly. If Chara has another good year and Boston is competitive (no reason to see why they won't be), do you let him walk or do you sign him for another year? There will be tons of teams willing to sign him for a couple of years.
With that said, I'd be very interested in carlo from a Toronto pov.
Hard to put a value on though.
Would never trade dermott for Carlo. Thats counterproductive. Johnsson neither.
Bracco? Brown? Prospect?
Who said he was useless?Excuse me if im wrong, but is that the "useless" Kapanen?