Carcillo "spamming" twitter with concussion related tweets/links

Status
Not open for further replies.

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
I follow this guy on twitter and he tweets about concussions, replies to other people in hockey´s tweets with tons of concussion related things even if their tweet has nothing to do with concussions. I have never seen anyone tweet about one thing as much as he does. He does it all day every day. Anyone know whats going on? Is he on a mission or something?
 

CallMeShaft

Calder Bedard Fan
Apr 14, 2014
15,866
21,456
He was best of friends with Steve Montador, who passed away at the age of 35 (and four days before his girlfriend gave birth) due to his issues with concussions during his career.

Carcillo changed after Montador died. He was still pretty physical for the remainder of that season and playoffs (Steve died in February, Carcillo and the Hawks went on to win the cup that year (2015)), but he called it quits and retired after that. He had more than enough in the tank to play several more years too.
 

tny760

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
19,493
20,404
something very disingenuous about a player of Carcillo's ilk championing the concussion movement. considering he gave out more than his fair share on questionable hits.
personally i'd rather hear it from someone who's been there and done that and recognizes the severity of what he(and others) have done

Gone | By Daniel Carcillo

as was said, montador changed carcillo
 

Pickle Rick

Registered User
Nov 11, 2016
70
162
Anyone who holds this guy's past mistakes against him when he's obviously recognized his faults and is now trying to be a positive influence is just a really sad person that really lacks compassion. It may be annoying to some people but personally I'm glad he's looking to help other people (and himself at the same time).
 

ThatGuy22

Registered User
Oct 11, 2011
10,519
4,195
Anyone who holds this guy's past mistakes against him when he's obviously recognized his faults and is now trying to be a positive influence is just a really sad person that really lacks compassion. It may be annoying to some people but personally I'm glad he's looking to help other people (and himself at the same time).

Personally, I disagree. I've seen him write/speak alot on the topic, and i've never seen him with any sort of introspective on the actions he's took as a player to put other players in danger. Lately he's been talking alot about how the NHL has done wrong, in order to be taken seriously he needs to admit and draw attention to the actions he took as a player, and how he regrets them.

That hasn't happened as far as i've been able to tell, and until it does it's fair to give him a bit of an eye roll.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,213
138,612
Bojangles Parking Lot
Anyone who holds this guy's past mistakes against him when he's obviously recognized his faults and is now trying to be a positive influence is just a really sad person that really lacks compassion. It may be annoying to some people but personally I'm glad he's looking to help other people (and himself at the same time).

Not so much a lack of compassion, as bemusement at seeing “activism” by the guy who regularly orchestrated nonsense like this:



Players like Carcillo are the very reason we now have anti-headshot and anti-fighting rules. A decade ago the game was infested with rats like him, who made a living out of running around trying to cut their peers’ careers short. This is not a guy who played a “gritty” game within the lines of what was acceptable, like Montador. He was a problem child from Day One and frankly we don’t really need his voice in this debate — the people who were actually ahead of the curve in the argument were arguing against HIM all along.
 

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
13,680
18,518
Las Vegas
Anyone who holds this guy's past mistakes against him when he's obviously recognized his faults and is now trying to be a positive influence is just a really sad person that really lacks compassion. It may be annoying to some people but personally I'm glad he's looking to help other people (and himself at the same time).

maybe so, but blaming the NHL is a cop out and dodges responsibility for how he chose to play the game. no one forced him to play the way he did but himself

he's not an idiot, I doubt he needed to be told elbowing people in the head was bad for their health.
 

Pilky01

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
9,867
2,319
GTA
Personally, I disagree. I've seen him write/speak alot on the topic, and i've never seen him with any sort of introspective on the actions he's took as a player to put other players in danger. Lately he's been talking alot about how the NHL has done wrong, in order to be taken seriously he needs to admit and draw attention to the actions he took as a player, and how he regrets them.

That hasn't happened as far as i've been able to tell, and until it does it's fair to give him a bit of an eye roll.

If people didn't play like Dan Carcillo there would be nothing for Dan Carcillo to now rail against.
 

Pickle Rick

Registered User
Nov 11, 2016
70
162
I don't disagree with you guys as far as his past. Maybe I'm just naive and give people the benefit of the doubt even when they don't deserve it, but given the choice I'd rather be on the positive side of things instead of cynical. I agree about the anti-NHL stuff and that makes him hypocritical. Its too bad some of the message gets sent down the drain along with the other stuff.
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
Anyone who holds this guy's past mistakes against him when he's obviously recognized his faults and is now trying to be a positive influence is just a really sad person that really lacks compassion. It may be annoying to some people but personally I'm glad he's looking to help other people (and himself at the same time).
I feel its something more there than just trying to be a positive influence. I obviously dont have any info to back that statement up with and its just speculation from me. But his behavior is just very weird, the way he is "spamming" all kinds of tweets etc. Specially with the reputation he had and the way he played.
 

AngelDuck

Rak 'em up
Jun 16, 2012
23,183
16,791
These guys are a bunch of babies. Should have picked a different career if you were going to cry about things after you made your money doing what YOU chose.

This guy chose to be a fighter/agitator type player. He chose to run around like an idiot and start a bunch of crap with other players. The league didn't make him do anything. He got his ass kicked a couple times and is now bitter at the league for "not protecting him".

What a bunch of garbage.
 

karnige

Real Life FTL
Oct 18, 2006
19,215
1,306
he was always a shady guy on the ice but he did take a lot of punishment also. but he had to, to have a job. I can see both sides.
 

Agent Zub

Registered User
Jan 2, 2015
14,536
11,799
I don't disagree with you guys as far as his past. Maybe I'm just naive and give people the benefit of the doubt even when they don't deserve it, but given the choice I'd rather be on the positive side of things instead of cynical. I agree about the anti-NHL stuff and that makes him hypocritical. Its too bad some of the message gets sent down the drain along with the other stuff.

I'm all for that, but he needs to own up to his own behaviour as guy who made millions by giving guys concussions.
 

sandysan

Registered User
Dec 7, 2011
24,834
6,388
He was best of friends with Steve Montador, who passed away at the age of 35 (and four days before his girlfriend gave birth) due to his issues with concussions during his career.

Carcillo changed after Montador died. He was still pretty physical for the remainder of that season and playoffs (Steve died in February, Carcillo and the Hawks went on to win the cup that year (2015)), but he called it quits and retired after that. He had more than enough in the tank to play several more years too.
I thought montador died of heart problems. How that is related to his concussions? I thought ( and I may be wrong) that his to screen was negative.

Irrespective of the cause it WAS too early but I'm not sure linking it to concussions does anyone any good.
 

clydesdale line

Connor BeJesus
Jan 10, 2012
24,624
22,678
I thought montador died of heart problems. How that is related to his concussions? I thought ( and I may be wrong) that his to screen was negative.

He took his own life.. how is that related to heart problems? (CTE was also found in his brain during an autopsy)
 
  • Like
Reactions: weems

sandysan

Registered User
Dec 7, 2011
24,834
6,388
He took his own life.. how is that related to heart problems? (CTE was also found in his brain during an autopsy)
I'm sure he probably had prostate cancer as well but that didn't kill him.

If he took his own life, my memory must be going as well.
 

zizbuka

Registered User
Apr 4, 2017
1,094
1,102
Why does everyone think it's a league's responsibility to stop players from head hunting? Former NFL players are suing the league, even though for years they were told to stop leading with their head. It's the players fault he's getting and/or giving concussions, it needs to stop there.

If you want to blame something, blame Sportscenter. Too many players were looking for 'highlight reel' hits, and stopped checking, or tackling in the NFL. The players need to be the ones to stop this nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad