Confirmed Trade: [CAR/NYR] Brady Skjei for 2020 1st round pick

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
18,878
14,872
Toronto, ON
I cannot imagine the wording of the trade allowing this. Much like Toronto's pick this year is tied to the Marleau trade, Carolina's pick is now tied to the Skjei trade. If they were to trade away Toronto's pick, I would guess they are risking having to give up their own first as a result.

There are lots of people making sure all caveats are covered in the trading of picks. See the Haula trade last year where they had to have multiple calls to clear up all the conditions.

Carolina's pick isn't specifically tied to the Skej trade. The understanding at this point is that the Rangers will receive the lower of Carolina's 1st round picks from this year. Does it specify that it is exclusive to only the TOR pick and the CAR pick? We don't know. That's the speculation but that's why the wording is very important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

Ola

Registered User
Apr 10, 2004
34,597
11,595
Sweden
Carolina's pick isn't specifically tied to the Skej trade. The understanding at this point is that the Rangers will receive the lower of Carolina's 1st round picks from this year. Does it specify that it is exclusive to only the TOR pick and the CAR pick? We don't know. That's the speculation but that's why the wording is very important.

This is in all likelihood not the case.

What if Carolina get a chance to acquire a top pick before the draft, would they be prohibited from doing that because the pick would just go to NYR?

99.99% sure that it’s the lower of Carolina and Toronto’s pick. The other alternative is just so random. NYR would always get the 31 pick. Like why wouldn’t Carolina always trade down to 31 if it was just any random 1st owed to NY? ;)
 

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
13,339
31,899
Western PA
Even if the Canes could trade down and give a lesser pick, they won't. Reputation and relationships are important. Screw the Rangers over and not only will the team lose a frequent trading partner, but also potentially scare off other clubs. The Rangers had leverage when it came to Fox and yet, they traded a high 2nd and a conditional pick that will end up in the mid-40s for him.

If the Canes weren't willing to give up upwards of a mid-1st for Skjei, they wouldn't have traded for him.
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
18,878
14,872
Toronto, ON
Even if the Canes could trade down and give a lesser pick, they won't. Reputation and relationships are important. Screw the Rangers over and not only will the team lose a frequent trading partner, but also potentially scare off other clubs. The Rangers had leverage when it came to Fox and yet, they traded a high 2nd and a conditional pick that will end up in the mid-40s for him.

If the Canes weren't willing to give up upwards of a mid-1st for Skjei, they wouldn't have traded for him.

I agree. I just think it would be interesting to see the actual wording because at this point it is somewhat ambiguous. In all likely hood, Rangers are going to get a pick around 20 OA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
55,731
42,719
Paying a 1st round pick to acquire an asset is just a bit different than paying zero assets and signing Gardiner (or Dzingle for that matter) to a discounted deal months into free agency.

It's not a discount. He's just not good anymore.
 

Kakko Schmakko

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
5,024
1,565
Canes lose another game and Skjei looked terrible on 2 goals against. Rangers now have more points than Canes, but Canes have 2 games at hand.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,915
38,912
colorado
Visit site
LOL 2nd error?! what a homer.
He bumbled a puck the first game. He bumbled one in this game. You’re conveniently not mentioning the fact the goal was actually scored from behind the net on our AHL goalie....

He was probably the best Cane on the ice after the gaffe, also.

Do you realize how pathetic you look watching Canes games....when we both know you never watched Canes games before....just to make note of every play you think Skjei messes up? Are you missing the Slavin, Gardiner and Edmunson errors in this game? The Canes were awful and disorganized, and were thoroughly outplayed.

But yeah sure....it was Skjei.
 

Tob

Registered User
Sep 16, 2017
15,906
35,034
This is hilarious. For how long are you guys going to watch canes games and then come to this thread and post every time Skjei makes a mistake?

it's literally just that one kakko shmacko dude. He was saying how great Skjei was and why didn't we get more for him, 99 hits, 8 goals bro. Then when the reality of the deal set in, he starts bashing him because it's a win if Skjei sucks. Insufferable. Reading through the whole thread, he starts by asking "Why would the Rangers trade Skjei to Carolina when they're in a playoff race against each other? Only a 1st round pick, I thought they would get more" to "The Rangers traded Skjei to the Canes to sabotage their season and team so we can get a better draft pick."

This is a trade that more than any other trade, Rangers fans has already crossed off his cap hit and forgotten about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cardiac Jerks

Tob

Registered User
Sep 16, 2017
15,906
35,034
He bumbled a puck the first game. He bumbled one in this game. You’re conveniently not mentioning the fact the goal was actually scored from behind the net on our AHL goalie....

He was probably the best Cane on the ice after the gaffe, also.

Do you realize how pathetic you look watching Canes games....when we both know you never watched Canes games before....just to make note of every play you think Skjei messes up? Are you missing the Slavin, Gardiner and Edmunson errors in this game? The Canes were awful and disorganized, and were thoroughly outplayed.

But yeah sure....it was Skjei.

Don't even bother with him. He never posted this much about Skjei when he was a Ranger. He complains about everything for fun.
 

Vancouver Canucks

Registered User
Feb 8, 2015
14,591
2,587
it's literally just that one kakko shmacko dude. He was saying how great Skjei was and why didn't we get more for him, 99 hits, 8 goals bro. Then when the reality of the deal set in, he starts bashing him because it's a win if Skjei sucks. Insufferable. Reading through the whole thread, he starts by asking "Why would the Rangers trade Skjei to Carolina when they're in a playoff race against each other? Only a 1st round pick, I thought they would get more" to "The Rangers traded Skjei to the Canes to sabotage their season and team so we can get a better draft pick."

This is a trade that more than any other trade, Rangers fans has already crossed off his cap hit and forgotten about.

Just ignore him; he doesn't seem to be knowledgeable, when it comes to this trade. He's just a die-hard Rangers fan, who thinks it's a win, if he bashes other teams for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tob

JT Kreider

FIRE GORDIE CLARK
Dec 24, 2010
16,903
15,464
NYC
Carolina's pick isn't specifically tied to the Skej trade. The understanding at this point is that the Rangers will receive the lower of Carolina's 1st round picks from this year. Does it specify that it is exclusive to only the TOR pick and the CAR pick? We don't know. That's the speculation but that's why the wording is very important.

Yes it is. In the Rangers release the wording IS very specific. Either Toronto's or Carolina's own first round pick. No nonsense where the Canes somehow trade for the Cup winners 1st round pick and think they'd actually get away with giving us 31st overall. C'mon now.

20200224_200850.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RangersFan1994

Vancouver Canucks

Registered User
Feb 8, 2015
14,591
2,587
Yes it is. In the Rangers release the wording IS very specific. Either Toronto's or Carolina's own first round pick.

View attachment 331911

Oh, wow. Carolina has one more first-round pick remaining. That doesn't mean there was much loss in that trade, because Carolina has another first-round pick, anyways. I mean, they can still participate in first round of the draft, even with Skjei.
 

JT Kreider

FIRE GORDIE CLARK
Dec 24, 2010
16,903
15,464
NYC
Oh, wow. Carolina has one more first-round pick remaining. That doesn't mean there was much loss in that trade, because Carolina has another first-round pick, anyways. I mean, they can still participate in first round of the draft, even with Skjei.

Not necessarily, if the Leafs pick is inside the top 11 then it is protected. If the Leafs miss the playoffs and get that high of a pick and the Canes miss the playoffs and win the lottery, well then, the Rangers won the lottery.
 

Lindberg Cheese

Registered User
Apr 28, 2013
7,257
4,728
Cambodia
Not sure if trade agreements are public domain? Would love to see one. Im sure there’s force majeure type language that prohibits teams from gaming an agreement with a side deal.
 

The S5

Registered User
Jul 27, 2017
4,422
4,217
He bumbled a puck the first game. He bumbled one in this game. You’re conveniently not mentioning the fact the goal was actually scored from behind the net on our AHL goalie....

He was probably the best Cane on the ice after the gaffe, also.

Do you realize how pathetic you look watching Canes games....when we both know you never watched Canes games before....just to make note of every play you think Skjei messes up? Are you missing the Slavin, Gardiner and Edmunson errors in this game? The Canes were awful and disorganized, and were thoroughly outplayed.

But yeah sure....it was Skjei.
That is typical Ranger fan nonsense. They get on a guy and ride him until the cows come home.
Look, I'm a Ranger fan, but there are so many who truly have no idea what they are talking about.
Skjei's give away sucked, but it didn't cost the Canes the game. Ned, who played well, let in a softy there.
What so many RAnger fans, who are strictly looking for confirmation, don't see is that Skjei has been really good for the Canes. He is playing with Fleury, who hasn't been very reliable defensively.
When the Canes get Dougie and Pesce back next season, they will have the best top 4 in the NHL.
 

Vancouver Canucks

Registered User
Feb 8, 2015
14,591
2,587
Not necessarily, if the Leafs pick is inside the top 11 then it is protected. If the Leafs miss the playoffs and get that high of a pick and the Canes miss the playoffs and win the lottery, well then, the Rangers won the lottery.

I know the Leafs suck in playoffs all the time, but I think neither will miss the playoffs. Even if one or both teams miss the playoffs, the probability of winning the draft lottery is pretty low, although it'd be nice, if you win it, of course.
 

JT Kreider

FIRE GORDIE CLARK
Dec 24, 2010
16,903
15,464
NYC
Not sure if trade agreements are public domain? Would love to see one. Im sure there’s force majeure type language that prohibits teams from gaming an agreement with a side deal.

The language is specific in the Rangers release, any confusion is because the Canes side of things is much more ambigious, but really who are you going to trust to be more on top of things in this situation?
 

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
23,912
5,662
Alexandria, VA
Not necessarily, if the Leafs pick is inside the top 11 then it is protected. If the Leafs miss the playoffs and get that high of a pick and the Canes miss the playoffs and win the lottery, well then, the Rangers won the lottery.

I dont trust what the Rangers said.

In just about all trades made in season for a 1st there are lottery/top 10 protections on the pick

Toronto just needs to finish 3rd in their division to make the playoffs. it doesnt matter what other teams records are. the 7th place team in metro can have a better record but toronto still goes.

Its likely Toronto's pick that goes to Rangers where it may be 13-17 range unless toronto can advance 2 playoff rounds.
 

Vancouver Canucks

Registered User
Feb 8, 2015
14,591
2,587
That is typical Ranger fan nonsense. They get on a guy and ride him until the cows come home.
Look, I'm a Ranger fan, but there are so many who truly have no idea what they are talking about.
Skjei's give away sucked, but it didn't cost the Canes the game. Ned, who played well, let in a softy there.
What so many RAnger fans, who are strictly looking for confirmation, don't see is that Skjei has been really good for the Canes. He is playing with Fleury, who hasn't been very reliable defensively.
When the Canes get Dougie and Pesce back next season, they will have the best top 4 in the NHL.

Who knows? This might be a sign that they lost the trade. :laugh:
 

BPD

Registered User
Jul 7, 2009
3,460
638
New York City
This is in all likelihood not the case.

What if Carolina get a chance to acquire a top pick before the draft, would they be prohibited from doing that because the pick would just go to NYR?

99.99% sure that it’s the lower of Carolina and Toronto’s pick. The other alternative is just so random. NYR would always get the 31 pick. Like why wouldn’t Carolina always trade down to 31 if it was just any random 1st owed to NY? ;)

It's very specifically a 2020 1st, either the Carolina or the Toronto pick.

If the Toronto pick remains with Toronto, so be it; then the Carolina pick, wherever it may fall, is the lower of the two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad