CapitalsCupReality
It’s Go Time!!
- Feb 27, 2002
- 64,713
- 19,569
How can we get Kovalchuk for the minimum?
He's signed for one more year and LA has no reason to buy him out because it's a 35+ contract.
aren’t we playing pretend lol?
How can we get Kovalchuk for the minimum?
He's signed for one more year and LA has no reason to buy him out because it's a 35+ contract.
How can we get Kovalchuk for the minimum?
He's signed for one more year and LA has no reason to buy him out because it's a 35+ contract.
Oh okay.aren’t we playing pretend lol?
I think his contract is getting terminated per multiple sources. Not bought out.How can we get Kovalchuk for the minimum?
He's signed for one more year and LA has no reason to buy him out because it's a 35+ contract.
Oh okay.
Let me think here.
I want Holtby at 3x1m
McDavid at 8x1m would be good too.
Let's add Hedman at 5x1mm too while we're at it.
According to Igor Eronko, his contract will be terminated.
They are just being a decent human beings and at least letting the man chase his dream elsewhere instead of just burying his career foreverInteresting. Considering there is no cap savings and very small cash savings (they'd still have to pay a warm body) LA would be basically just saying "I hate you so much I am paying you to go away"
He is a rich man, he can allow himself to play just for legacy.If he has “lucrative” offers, the minimum doesn’t seem like a likely path.
They are just being a decent human beings and at least letting the man chase his dream elsewhere instead of just burying his career forever
I think it all stems from Desjardins ruining the relationship last year and scratching Kovy and sticking him on the fourth line when he played. One would assume that Todd McLellan could have attempted to fix the situation, but, who knows? I imagine the relationship was soured with the team and Kovy last year and there was more going on behind the scenes that we don't know about.Interesting. Considering there is no cap savings and very small cash savings (they'd still have to pay a warm body) LA would be basically just saying "I hate you so much I am paying you to go away"
Boston is not for him. Aside from that top line, they are not a dynamic team. They are a blue collar type of team that tends to grind out wins. Caps suit him more. He excels in skill heavy system with a lot of passing, creativity and especially if he has a center who is driving the play. He's not that good anymore to just pick the puck up on the fly in his own zone and dangle the F out of everybody to score goals. Still has a good shot though and above average skating. I'd even say he skates really good for his age.I just read a tweet saying Kovalchuk will forfeit 4.7m in cash since its mutual termination.
LA still on the hook for 6.25m in cap hit this year and next, not that it matters for a rebuilding team.
I think Kovalchuk is Boston bound. They desperately need scoring depth.
You make a really good point about Boston.I just read a tweet saying Kovalchuk will forfeit 4.7m in cash since its mutual termination.
LA still on the hook for 6.25m in cap hit this year and next, not that it matters for a rebuilding team.
I think Kovalchuk is Boston bound. They desperately need scoring depth.
2002-2012 Kovalchuk? Hellz yeahThere is seriously anyone here that wants Kovulchuk?
Holtby can't sign more than 1 year with the Caps and I don't think he would be willing to do it. Samsonov is still looking like a strong candidate to be protected by the Caps in the expansion draft. I think Seattle would most definitely choose Holtby if he were left unprotected and even if he already had his new contract making $8 million per season.Term is another factor, If he wants 7-8 years than no thank you.
Rumor has it, in a couple days the Kings/Kovalchuk will mutually agree to terminate his contract, but his cap hit would still remain with the Kings. He would then basically become a free agent.How can we get Kovalchuk for the minimum?
He's signed for one more year and LA has no reason to buy him out because it's a 35+ contract.
Those lucrative offers are from the KHL. He has indicated he still wants to play in the NHL.If he has “lucrative” offers, the minimum doesn’t seem like a likely path.
Those lucrative offers are from the KHL. He has indicated he still wants to play in the NHL.
I think the point was, he's got 'em but he's not interested... basically evidence that he's willing to do what it takes to play in the NHL and try to win a Cup.Seems odd to bring up then....
I think the point was, he's got 'em but he's not interested... basically evidence that he's willing to do what it takes to play in the NHL and try to win a Cup.
I actually agree. Just trying to interpret other posters.I’ll be surprised if he signs for the minimum. I suspect that comment was to warn off low ball offers....we’ll see.