krutovsdonut
eeyore
- Sep 25, 2016
- 16,940
- 9,634
If Tanev is on the team and healthy I doubt they move him assuming of course the team is even somewhat close to the playoffs.
true. but i was giving my opinion on what i would do.
If Tanev is on the team and healthy I doubt they move him assuming of course the team is even somewhat close to the playoffs.
Eriksson does not have value to OTT. They are almost at the floor with multiple RFAs to signeriksson has value to ottawa. he bumps their cap for cheap and can still contribute. eriksson plus a goldobin is a good deal for them in isolation.
but the trouble is there is only one ottawa and many bad contracts. so their cap space is scarce and valuable and someone else may pay them far more than eriksson's value to dump a worse contract there . so our one hope is that melnyk won't pay the salary.
I’m sorry but why are losing their **** now on four rumours that haven been around for an entire calendar year?
Chill
If we plan on trading Tanev and resigning Hutton then assuming Hughes is the real deal then we'd probably start the season looking like this.
Edler Stecher
Hughes Myers
Hutton Benn
eriksson has value to ottawa. he bumps their cap for cheap and can still contribute. eriksson plus a goldobin is a good deal for them in isolation.
but the trouble is there is only one ottawa and many bad contracts. so their cap space is scarce and valuable and someone else may pay them far more than eriksson's value to dump a worse contract there . so our one hope is that melnyk won't pay the salary.
So a Benn Hutton pairing?
Get it? Ben Hutton?
{spoiler}Benn.. Jordie Benn... but then you take away the extra n.. and it become Hutton's first name! Ben.
Wondered the same.. then someone informed me Benn plays the R side... So i guess THAT.It’s so bad it’s glorious.....
Also I want to know which dman they want to replace Tanev with. If it’s the bunch they have now minus Tanev then lol
Wait are we talking your benn Hutton joke or the pairings. Cause I thought the joke was so bad it was awesome. Not the pairing. Didn’t give that a thoughtWondered the same.. then someone informed me Benn plays the R side... So i guess THAT.
But I still don't buy these chain of events occurring.
Yeah... I know... the pairing could be a thing... due to Benn being able to play the right... (If the trade Tanev-re-sign Hutton thing happens).Wait are we talking your benn Hutton joke or the pairings. Cause I thought the joke was so bad it was awesome. Not the pairing. Didn’t give that a thought
As noted, Ottawa is almost at the cap floor.
They have absolutely zero reason to help us out of a godawful contract unless they get a substantial amount back.
I still think there's a deal to be made that saves Ottawa cash but not cap space.
Eg, Eriksson for Gaborik and Condom saves the Sens almost $2M in cash, and puts a checker on the roster.
I still think there's a deal to be made that saves Ottawa cash but not cap space.
Eg, Eriksson for Gaborik and Condom saves the Sens almost $2M in cash, and puts a checker on the roster.
I still think there's a deal to be made that saves Ottawa cash but not cap space.
Eg, Eriksson for Gaborik and Condom saves the Sens almost $2M in cash, and puts a checker on the roster.
What does this do for Van?
I still think there's a deal to be made that saves Ottawa cash but not cap space.
Eg, Eriksson for Gaborik and Condom saves the Sens almost $2M in cash, and puts a checker on the roster.
What does this do for Van?
And I'm struggling to understand why Hutton is still on the market after all the mediocre d-men who've so far been signed around the league. Hands up anyone who figured that UFA's Granlund, Schenn and Pouliot would actually get contracts elsewhere before Hutton.
Gets rid of Erikson and let's Gaborik's cap hit go to LTIR. Question I would have would be whether MG's salary would be covered by insurance, which would remove any benefit for Ottawa, unless they feel LE can be a useful bottom 6 for them.
Ugh.
That sounds grossly like they're doubling around on Marcus Johansson, a defensive liability who scored 3 ES goals in 32 games for Boston but somehow was a 'good addition' because he picked up a clutch goal and a few PP points on a team that went deep in the playoffs. Stay the hell away.
Also, they're just 'getting concerned' that they might have to package a prime asset to unload Eriksson? How was this not completely obvious for the last two years?
And trading Tanev would be hilarious.
What decade is JB living in? Ferland? Seriously?Dhaliwal says there's been no contact between Johansson and Vancouver. They have been linked to Ferland, however.
80 percent of Gaborik's salary is covered by insurance.Gets rid of Erikson and let's Gaborik's cap hit go to LTIR. Question I would have would be whether MG's salary would be covered by insurance, which would remove any benefit for Ottawa, unless they feel LE can be a useful bottom 6 for them.
Is there any kind of source on this?80 percent of Gaborik's salary is covered by insurance.