Smokey McCanucks
PuckDaddy "Perfect HFBoard Trade Proposal 02/24/14
- Dec 21, 2010
- 3,165
- 283
I don't often disagree with you but Miller was terrible this entire game and is lucky they didn't put the game out of reach in the third. All of the goals were easily saveable if he had just correctly executed the simple fundamentals.
The Good
Miller - made some just outstanding saves and that tying goal was inch perfect and I don't see how you don't simply congratulate the shooter on that one.
I don't often disagree with you but Miller was terrible this entire game and is lucky they didn't put the game out of reach in the third. All of the goals were easily saveable if he had just correctly executed the simple fundamentals.
What are the 'Nucks going to do with Burrows and Higgins?....still a year left on their contacts, but they're so far below the bar of NHL players earning the kind of the money they're making, that I just can't see how they can bring them back....Shinkaruk with a four point night and Gaunce with another two goals in the minors......maybe they can put the veterans on waivers and see what happens.
No. Because his style just doesn't work unless you have an entire team on board. Even his old coach in Buffalo was trying to modernize his game.
The reason goalies have been so successful is because with the help of good coaches they have been able to change their games in response to changes to the game and to themselves.
If you look at Osgood, the reason he was able to win those last couple cups after almost being out of the league was because he completely changed his game to a more modern style.
Or Luongo, his game has grown leaps and bounds after working with Melanson here.
What are the 'Nucks going to do with Burrows and Higgins?....still a year left on their contacts, but they're so far below the bar of NHL players earning the kind of the money they're making, that I just can't see how they can bring them back....Shinkaruk with a four point night and Gaunce with another two goals in the minors......maybe they can put the veterans on waivers and see what happens.
Again, I like your posts but disagree here. His 'style' doesn't work because he overcompensates at times, and occasionally cheats. He also becomes overly aggressive when he seems frustrated. Lets not forget that he's not a big guy nor a young man.
It's as simple as that.
I think both pass through waivers at this point, unfortunately. If Benning can move them for any value without taking a bad contract back it will be a success.
Except this overcompensation has been happening for the better part of 3-4 years. At some point you have to ask yourself where the weak link is.
And he's not 'sometimes overcompensating'. He's doing it most of the time. It indicates a serious lack of thought in his game, which he is purportedly very thoughtful about.
I think you have to hold on to The Burr.
If, for nothing else, taking such a selfless, incredibly team-centric view on his previous contract.
One could argue (aside from his game 7 OT goal) that this low, selfless, contract gave us that little edge to put together our crazy cap-tight 2011 run.
Burr deserves to retire a Canuck.
Except this overcompensation has been happening for the better part of 3-4 years. At some point you have to ask yourself where the weak link is.
And he's not 'sometimes overcompensating'. He's doing it most of the time. It indicates a serious lack of thought in his game, which he is purportedly very thoughtful about.
I take Burrows and his still solid penalty killing at 4M every time over Dorsett at 2.5M. Given his history with the team, no way in hell is he a buyout candidate. At most, you quietly do what they did to Bieksa; only problem is, his reputation league wide is the opposite so there's no way in hell you get any sort of value back. Not worth it.
This game was Ryan Miller's tenure as a Canuck in a nut shell. Fighting the puck all game, makes a couple big saves on some weird defending only to let in a back breaker late. Ends up shutting things down a bit (dramatically) in OT and pulls out a W. .893 sv% so by any reasonable statistical analysis, not a very good game at all, but according to the eye test of someone like Willie he made some key saves late and held on for the win.
If he prefers that, sure. But he might also prefer playing for a cup contender. If we get creative and retain some salary maybe there's a good fit all-around and we can get a piece back.
Except this overcompensation has been happening for the better part of 3-4 years. At some point you have to ask yourself where the weak link is.
And he's not 'sometimes overcompensating'. He's doing it most of the time. It indicates a serious lack of thought in his game, which he is purportedly very thoughtful about.
No. Because his style just doesn't work unless you have an entire team on board. Even his old coach in Buffalo was trying to modernize his game.
The reason goalies have been so successful is because with the help of good coaches they have been able to change their games in response to changes to the game and to themselves.
If you look at Osgood, the reason he was able to win those last couple cups after almost being out of the league was because he completely changed his game to a more modern style.
Or Luongo, his game has grown leaps and bounds after working with Melanson here.
Glad I'm not the only one who saw this. Miller was fighting the puck all game long. Wasn't square to the shooter on the tying goal and it cost him.
Really liking what I'm seeing from Bo. You can tell he's busting his ass to get out of that slump, soon something will give and I can see him putting up some more points. He and Baertschi (who's better along the boards and driving the net more) both showed what they're made of and it's good to see.
I've been an avid supporter of Baertschi so it's good to see he's getting rewarded more ice time. He's committed more to defense and good neutral zone play, he's developing.
Also liked what I saw from Vey tonight. Can't blame him at all for the 1st goal, that was on Burrows. Vey made some good passes and drove the play a bit, hopefully he keeps it up.
Hutton showed his poise again tonight, just a good player. It's obvious that the NHL schedule is taking a toll on him but he's sticking to his game and it works. Developing well.
Biega is a beast. Let's get him on the power play Willie. Biega and Hutton together would be great but that would leave the two tire-fires together.
4th line was alright. Dorsett the worst as per usual. Higgins is sadly completely irrelevant. He used to be tenacious on the forechecking but he seems completely out of it. Injured? Based on merit, he should be sitting (call up Jensen/Grenier/Gaunce/Shinkaruk.
Weber wasn't crap tonight, which is all I ask. Bartkowski was kind of crap, kind if not. Looked like the pass was open for McCann on the 3v3 but he was intent on scoring. Too bad.
Miller... Enough has been said. He makes great saves but often gets way out of position or makes baaaad reads. His shoutout performance made up for the 1st + 3rd goals and got the team the two points.
I would love nothing more than to tune in and watch Miller put up .920+ in every start. But I don't have much sympathy for him because his decisions are frankly stupid. As I posted in the other thread he is basically going against the grain of play for every other goalie in the NHL by choosing to gain depth all the time. There is a reason nobody does it blindly like he is doing it now - it's the simple evolution of the way the position is played.
Right now Miller is basically saying well screw you guys I know what is best ... which would be fine except his stats show he is playing like crap. And this team is not constructed to help him play a more aggressive style so he is also basically forcing the team to adapt to him instead of the other way around.
So yeah, not much sympathy from this corner but he's our goalie so I try to support him.