Yet we should ignore Mason being at .921 over the last 3 years?
Of our shots, how many were "great scoring chances"? Weak wristers from the side boards all day long. The caps actually have shooters and scorers. We do not. Our best scorer gets then from rebounds. Theirs gets them from great shooting.
And I have YET to see anyone tell us who in hell we are supposed to get that is an upgrade? Go ahead. Tell us should is better that we can get?
I'm ignoring nothing.
Holtby performs at better than .921 over the course of his career, which is a much longer sample than Mason's Flyers career.
In addition, he plays many more games per season. That matters, especially since everyone wants to say Mason's been carrying a heavy workload.
He's not. His workload is nothing at all unusual for an NHL goalie.
Furthermore, even after playing more games every year than Mason, Holtby plays even better in the playoffs.
Mason hasn't proven he can do any of these things.
************************************************
I don't have anyone to replace Mason. I'm not suggesting he needs to be replaced. I said he was a slightly above average goalie. In the playoffs, with no weak teams, he's probably well below average.
I mean, I'm willing to entertain the notion that he's better than Martin Jones or Brian Elliott or MAF, but that's probably it.
I'm saying it's ridiculous for anyone to defend Mason this series, he's been the worst goalie of the playoffs, he's given up the most soft goals of anyone in the playoffs, and he's given the Flyers no chance to win the last two games.
I'm fine with Mason/Neuvy next year, and sorting through Lyon/Stolarz/Sandstrom et al and see what shakes out.
I think, if the Flyers get into the playoffs again next year, they need to stop pretending that Mason is some true No. 1/Vezina type goalie, and play him 3 of 4 games while working in Neuvy at least once a series.