Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 42,997
- 9,190
Wow, we wasted our waiver claim on Nemeth when we could have Pickard back for nothing...wtf
The NHL isn't fantasy hockey. You don't move to the back to the line after claiming someone
Wow, we wasted our waiver claim on Nemeth when we could have Pickard back for nothing...wtf
You can’t claim a player off waivers and turn around and trade him. The player has to remain on your roster for the rest of the season or put back on waivers.
You can claim a player off waivers and trade them. So long as only one team submits a waiver claim.
Its funny cuz didn't he got the Vegas fans to design his new mask?
what was the rush?
So yesterday McPhee says that Subban isn't ready for the NHL yet but he'll stay up, and now he waives Pickard. I don't know what he's doing but I don't imagine Fleury-Subban being better than Fleury-Pickard at this point in time.
wow. subban over pickard? I think they are clearly going on potential here and not on actual skill. Interesting move by Vagas. Pickard gets claimed here for sure. hes better then 5+ teams backup right now including bostons.
All things considered, though, Vegas was a likely destination for Subban to begin with.
Ahead of the 2017 Expansion Draft this past June, InGoal took a look at players that the Golden Knights would likely want to select based on prior patterns from their coaches, GM, and scouting staff. Subban, with his quick reflexes and high-frequency movement style of play, seemed like a perfect fit:
“Subban may not be quite as attractive because he requires waivers, but the athletic 23-year-old Boston Bruins prospect does have a skill set Prior has prioritized in past drafts with the Capitals and is unlikely to get claimed on the way down to the AHL after being passed in the Bruins organization by Zane McIntyre this season. Several goalie observers have speculated he might be a good project for Vegas.”
It seems that Vegas may have passed him over for the very reason that he’d be a waiver claim, but then went ahead and claimed him themselves.
While this creates a bit of a crowded crease for Vegas, it’s a no-risk option for the team. Best case, Subban comes out of the gate hotter than Pickard – and with him already an attractive piece to their staff, he gets kept on board to become the new heir apparent to Fleury. Worst case, he continues to struggle as he has in the last few years, and they re-waive him, almost certainly sending him back to Boston to get more development time.
What's wrong with that scenario? It gives Anaheim a reliable back-up for zero assets until Miller is healthy, with a guarantee he'll be claimed when he's put back on waivers (given he doesn't stink it up). At worst, his contract ends at the end of the year. I'm not quite sure why the other goalie contracts have any bearing on claiming Pickard for the Ducks, as Berra would still be starting in the AHL if Miller was healthy.
I can sort of see what McPhee is trying to do there. It's the right time of year to slip a backup goaltender through waivers, if ever there is one.
Sorry to quote my own post, but I see now that there's a rule to prevent bottom teams from hogging waiver claims. I thought this only applied to return waivers (a European player entering the league mid season or something).Where do these things come from?
Bob Mackenzie said the Vegas goalie coach thinks Subban has a chance of being a starting goalie due to his physical abilities (potential), while they believe Pickard will not be better than a backup goalie.
How is not selecting Dumba versus what they got in return going to pay off? (They get Erik Haula and Alex Tuch, and they had to give up a 3rd rounder and not take Dumba)???
Could have taken Marc Methot, and didn't. (His trade value is certainly higher than anything they currently have on D)
Could have had DeHaan or Pulock, or Brock Nelson, and didn't. (Plus they have actually have to pay Grabovski to not play)(I know they got a 1st rounder, but it will be mid pack at best)
Could have taken Grubauer who looks pretty good from what I have seen. (Instead they now have Subban as backup)
As for Grabovski, Vegas isn't giving him a red cent to not pay. His contract his fully covered by insurance while he is injured and he has publicly stated he wants to play this year for Vegas.
Bob Mackenzie said the Vegas goalie coach thinks Subban has a chance of being a starting goalie due to his physical abilities (potential), while they believe Pickard will not be better than a backup goalie.
Maybe he can beat it up.Sure Physical abilities but can he stop the puck? apparently not very well
I agree with you.So it's basically like he chose his no.1 and no.2 pick from Boston while choosing the obvious player from Colorado's exposed list. Now is the time to waive players, there's a good chance he doesn't even get picked up.
This actually does make some sense by Vegas. Yes Pickard is better than subban, but they can't send Malcolm down. This way if he clears (which is likely) they get BOTH goalies in their system.
Worse case scenario he gets claimed and they downgrade in the 2G spot, but it's not much of a downgrade. Imo the reward outweighs the risk. It's a bold gutsy move, One of the few GMGM moves I like
He wasnt the biggest problem tonightPens should be all over this. Niemi is done... lol.
I wonder if the Leafs waiving Marincin was potentially due to hearing that Pickard would be hitting waivers? They can successfully claim him and not be over the roster limit, giving them time to way McBackup. Although I guess they could have sent Borgman down for a day instead of waiving Marincin.
I knew I couldn't possibly be the first one to think of this, but it crossed my mind before reading your post.Penguins should claim him.
The first goal, dude totally wasn't paying attention. That puck probably hits him, if he didn't lose sight of it and wasn't playing the other side of the net.He wasnt the biggest problem tonight