missingmika
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2006
- 4,525
- 1,835
The scale is irrelevant, what matters is the message. Beasley is allowed his speech. Besides, if we're speaking on the grander scale there are millions of people out there who will not be taking the vaccine for a variety of reasons. Many of the people I come across seem to have a healthy skepticism of the vaccine. They see themselves as perfectly healthy individuals for the most part, and are not comfortable administering something into their bodies by means of force or coercion. Believe it or not, this IS having an affect on their lives. I think people need to accept that not everyone is going to go along with something just because a select few suggest it's for 'the greater good.' Also, the claims that Beasley is anti-science is a fallacy. What about the many scientists that agree with his stance, are they anti-science?
Beasley spoke. He’s allowed to speak.
Being allowed to speak doesn’t mean you’re free from consequences.
Im okay with cutting him. Helps the Bills vaccinated percentages and gets rid of the negative attention. WR room is deep enough without him.