This fallacy is why you're getting so much push back. A 1st and a 2nd is pretty likely to result in an NHL player.
To get Risto and Nylander--- starts with Foote+ Cirreli+ 2020 1st
To get Risto and Nylander--- starts with Foote+ Cirreli+ 2020 1st
I don't buy that. We had 15 forwards play a game for us last year of those 15 forwards here is the breakdown of when they were drafted.
1st Stamkos and Miller
2nd Erne and Kucherov
3rd Cirelli, Point and Killorn
4th Joseph, Paquette and Callahan
7th Palat
Undrafted Johnson, Gourde, Conacher and Martel
11 were 3rd round or later. Sure our best player was a 2nd round pick but extremely late. Your early 3rd + our late 3rd gets you into the 50's which is where he was picked. So a 3rd does have value if you draft well or trade well. You grabbed Sheary last year for a 3rd. Callahan can also be flipped at the deadline for an additional pick or two if you want to retain. The cost to dump Callahan might not be a 3rd but it won't be a 1st or a top 5 prospect of ours, Barre-Barré-.
I think a deal could happen between Buffalo and TB but it wont be this. We wouldnt trade Foote for Karlsson, what makes you think we would do it for Risto?
To get Risto and Nylander--- starts with Foote+ Cirreli+ 2020 1st
What makes you think Bufalo would be taking on 3+ yrs of $5M contracts without getting an ELC player or prospect that actually replaces what is getting traded.
If you want Risto a young Dman will have to be coming back.
If Buffalo is going to take on Miller or Johnson then Cirelli comes back. with them
Another GM, Karlsson and Risto's contract term, you never know. Although I might not touch Foote, but Cirelli would be very interesting for Buffalo, and I know Tampa wouldn't want to give him up. But if Tampa were really asking Risto, then our GM would have to ask Cirelli as the bulk of the deal.I think a deal could happen between Buffalo and TB but it wont be this. We wouldnt trade Foote for Karlsson, what makes you think we would do it for Risto?
3rds and later being something beyond replacement are lucky picks.
a low 1st-mid 2nd has about a 20% chance of being something beyond a dime a dozen replacement player. about a 50% chance of not being anything beyond a cup of coffee.
What makes you think Bufalo would be taking on 3+ yrs of $5M contracts without getting an ELC player or prospect that actually replaces what is getting traded.
If you want Risto a young Dman will have to be coming back.
If Buffalo is going to take on Miller or Johnson then Cirelli comes back. with them
Another GM, Karlsson and Risto's contract term, you never know. Although I might not touch Foote, but Cirelli would be very interesting for Buffalo, and I know Tampa wouldn't want to give him up. But if Tampa were really asking Risto, then our GM would have to ask Cirelli as the bulk of the deal.
If you’re paying attention to my threads I never said it would be a 2R. I said 4RThis fallacy is why you're getting so much push back. A 1st and a 2nd is pretty likely to result in an NHL player.
Miller and Johnson are better than 80% of your forwards. Don't act like you aren't getting significantly better forwards back.What makes you think Bufalo would be taking on 3+ yrs of $5M contracts without getting an ELC player or prospect that actually replaces what is getting traded.
If you want Risto a young Dman will have to be coming back.
If Buffalo is going to take on Miller or Johnson then Cirelli comes back. with them
Another GM, Karlsson and Risto's contract term, you never know. Although I might not touch Foote, but Cirelli would be very interesting for Buffalo, and I know Tampa wouldn't want to give him up. But if Tampa were really asking Risto, then our GM would have to ask Cirelli as the bulk of the deal.
To get Risto and Nylander--- starts with Foote+ Cirreli+ 2020 1st
What? So Johnson and Miller are cap dumps now and we have to trade Cirelli in hopes someone will take them? You adding Mittelstadt for us to take on that dump Risto?
You really wanted to prove your own point, didn't you?We can pretty much lock this thread up now, this isn't going anywhere productive.
Lol @ people acting like Miller/Johnson are dumps.
This site is cute.
hell ****ing no
Miller+Callahan+ 4th= 2nd in 2020
Ristolainen >>>Johnson
What? So Johnson and Miller are cap dumps now and we have to trade Cirelli in hopes someone will take them? You adding Mittelstadt for us to take on that dump Risto?
Risto to Toronto for Kadri/Nylander/Kappanen from a leafs fan. Leafs are desperate for a minute munching RHd Ristolainen is criminally underrated he’d be nuts with Muzzin. Not a 1D but a 2DThen give an alternative...adding Johnson and Miller to the Sabres lineup would make the Sabres much better.
And Callahan's contract is for one season.
We need centers, our left-side is pretty set with (hopefully) Skinner, Sheary and Olofsson.
I see no problem with Callahan waiving for Buffalo, since he's from Rochester...and he could certainly help talk Johnson into coming.
If we could do it without giving up 30/31 OA, that would be even more ideal.
We, as Sabres fan, overvalue Ristolainen...and I'm not trying to inflate the TB players, I'm a Sabres fan.
I don't want to trade him, but it seems inevitable that he will be traded for forward help...and he's our only trade chip.
How do you figure? We trade a defensemen that is most likely leaving anyways, a prospect that has stalled in his development, and some picks for three useful forwards.
Offer some alternative if you don't like this...that's the point of this forum.
I don't see how Sabres fans wouldn't like this. We lose 40 points in Ristolainen, and gain 130 points in the three forwards. Take out the 1st round pick, if that makes it more fair.
I originally thought it could be Ristolainen for Johnson, and for taking Callahan off Tampa's hands they would send us Miller for a 2020 3rd round pick.
So it would be Ristolainen and a 2020 3rd round pick for Johnson, Miller and Callahan...but that just doesn't seem to be enough, maybe make it a 2nd or add Nylander?
If you aren't willing to give up anything of real value Buffalo shouldn't be interested and quite frankly no team should be. It's great your team has hit on mid/late round picks, but the majority of the league misses on those picks. Some stupid team/GM might buckle and take Callahan for a middling return. I sure wouldn't bet the farm on that though.I don't buy that. We had 15 forwards play a game for us last year of those 15 forwards here is the breakdown of when they were drafted.
1st Stamkos and Miller
2nd Erne and Kucherov
3rd Cirelli, Point and Killorn
4th Joseph, Paquette and Callahan
7th Palat
Undrafted Johnson, Gourde, Conacher and Martel
11 were 3rd round or later. Sure our best player was a 2nd round pick but extremely late. Your early 3rd + our late 3rd gets you into the 50's which is where he was picked. So a 3rd does have value if you draft well or trade well. You grabbed Sheary last year for a 3rd. Callahan can also be flipped at the deadline for an additional pick or two if you want to retain. The cost to dump Callahan might not be a 3rd but it won't be a 1st or a top 5 prospect of ours, Barre-Barré-.