I'm afraid you've missed my point. I appreciate all the stats you've compiled - they're excellent, but they're only part of the picture in determining who wins the Selke. Bergeron had another great season as the pre-eminent two-way forward of the league, absolutely. But it's expected he'll have a great season, that's what he does. So the bar for him is set really high. And Bergeron has had even better seasons than the one just past. So instantly in the back of their minds voters have this perception of, yeah Bergy was really good, but he's been better. He was not outstanding relative to his past performances. That weighs against him when you've got a younger guy like Couturier in the mix making a good case for himself, or even an O'Reilly who'll get attention as the most recent winner.
Bergeron deserves another Selke. If he wins I'll be as happy as anyone. But I think the odds of him doing so aren't great.
I think you're attributing too much to games played for recent years. Here's a list of the most games missed by Selke nominees since the 2004/05 lockout (5+ games missed):
10/11 Datsyuk (3rd) - 26
17/18 Bergeron (3rd) - 18
18/19 Bergeron (3rd) - 17
05/06 Mike Fisher (3rd) - 14
11/12 Datsyuk (3rd) - 12
07/08 Zetterberg (3rd) - 7
12/13 Bergeron (2nd) - 6
13/14 Toews (3rd) - 6
18/19 Stone (2nd) - 5
He's much more in line with that 2012/13 season this year, the one where he missed out by an absolutely minuscule amount to Toews for 1st. He missed 9 games, but is only at 7 less than some teams have played. A strong Selke candidate in Stone played 65 games compared to Bergeron's 61.
Not to mention this year there's a huge disparity in games played for the Calder and Vezina voting, and Makar and Rask will still be right in the mix, with Makar being the favorite.