DominicT
Registered User
Interesting Minnesota was on the bottom of that list whether intentional or not sounds like something else may be cooking
Actually they were 5th
Interesting Minnesota was on the bottom of that list whether intentional or not sounds like something else may be cooking
I don't think the Rangers are really thrilled with losing him, tbth, Brad, from reading their board and it might be what we saw with Staal in Minnesota, and that's why Coyle became the plan BWhat are folks thoughts on Zucarello? Think he's a great second option should bidding for Stone get out of hand. Not a good as player but could slide nicely in that 2RW spot. He's also been on fire recently.
Actually they were 5th
So looking at the list, would you change the order? Not including Minny of course....
V
What are your thoughts on the trade?No I would not. It doesn't mean they are attainable. Acquiring Coyle may change the target from say the NYR?
If the bruins get Stone... then they are going be tough to beat. To me this is the guy you have to land. We have the assets to get it done. Stone and Dzingel would be even better
I think with how deadline cap space is calculated we have plenty of room to add a big fish this year, but if we add another guy with term or want to extend a UFA then salary would have to go out somewhere.Does this leave enough dough for a top target, like Stone?
And wondering if this means we could more comfortably include Frederic or Studnicka in a deal now with a youngish center in the mix.
So no Hayes but maybe Zuccarello?No I would not. It doesn't mean they are attainable. Acquiring Coyle may change the target from say the NYR?
What are your thoughts on the trade?
As far as I know there's plenty of dough left. I think around 12m according to capfriendly.Does this leave enough dough for a top target, like Stone?
And wondering if this means we could more comfortably include Frederic or Studnicka in a deal now with a youngish center in the mix.
I don't think the Rangers are really thrilled with losing him, tbth, Brad, from reading their board and it might be what we saw with Staal in Minnesota, and that's why Coyle became the plan B
REMEMBER, THE Rangers were kinda forced into the trade last year with Tampa; JT Miller/McDONAGH, who at the time was their Captain, AND from what I'M seeing there do they want to lose another "face" of their identity....
it's much like speculating, even if were true, about trading a "core" Bruin player, even if were possible with players have the clauses they have...
Trade Grzelyck, Frederic, 1st, 3rd for Stone.
I'd only want them to do it if he'd be willing to sign long term.Thats insane for a rental.
I like the move. Not a sexy move, but fills a hole and makes us better.
Not a brag inducing move by any means. But the GM did his job here.
Nice that Donny gets things started this week also.
Need a big name for the second line and we have the assets to do it.
Will be interesting to see what happens in the next 5 days.
that's why you tell Charlie Jacobs if he wants to win a cup for his dad then he gives Stone 90% in bonuses and make it a sign & trade.Thats insane for a rental.
Yeah I feel the same way. What I like most about the trade is they seem to be going for it. That is the right approach at this time.I'm okay with the price.
Would rather wait a few games to make judgement
I'd only want them to do it if he'd be willing to sign long term.
Agreed.
Go for it with Stone. All in.
Gryzlyck, Zboril, Senny, 1st, +
Does this leave enough dough for a top target, like Stone?
And wondering if this means we could more comfortably include Frederic or Studnicka in a deal now with a youngish center in the mix.
Where's the Donny-Do-Nothing crowd?