Could the Bruins sign both Hayes and Stone in the off-season I’d they wanted to? Let’s say they got rid of Backes’ contract and sign Hayes to $5.5M AAV. Stone would cost $7-8.5M I’m guessing, and then you have Mcavoy and Carlo.
Could the Bruins sign both Hayes and Stone in the off-season I’d they wanted to? Let’s say they got rid of Backes’ contract and sign Hayes to $5.5M AAV. Stone would cost $7-8.5M I’m guessing, and then you have Mcavoy and Carlo.
Well, I think 'draft and develop' is 50% of the gig. If you can get that part right you can suck at the other two things and still turn out alright. Of course, if you were passable at the other two you'd be better than alright.
@neelynugs said he thought we'd be in great shape if we got someone from the A list and someone from the B list but that realistically he was expecting someone from the B list and C list. It got me thinking, would two guys from the B list be enough? (Leave it to the B's to pass on the A-player to get two B-players but that's a story for a different time.)
Report: Maple Leafs have shown interest in NHL enforcer.
According to a report from The Athletic's Rick Carpiniello the Toronto Maple Leafs have expressed interest in none other than former Boston Bruins enforcer Adam McQuaid.
I think having Backes’ money in the bottom 6 has gotten to me. I guess Hayes would be best as a rental anyway, hope Studnicka is ready next year.I think you are underselling on Stone price, rumors have been much higher.
Signing Hayes for 5.5 annually seems absurd for this org to go. Are you planning on trading Krejci? I can't see Hayes as a 5.5 million 3rd liner, and having him as a 2nd liner at any price seems pretty risky.
And even at those prices, I think you would have to make a major cap clearing move like dealing Krejci for futures to make money work
Please I hope this doesn’t happen. Also most people thought we could win the cup and why not we were the best team in the league after our rough start last year.It's a fair question, but you need to define "enough"? If Sweeney gets two B guys, will people think he did "enough" to defend his job? Probably. Like Nash last season...he did something and it wasn't totally trivial. It wasn't going to be enough to allow them to cmpete for a Cup and everyone knew it, but it filled a hole and made them more capable. If that's his goal again, then 2 B players does the trick. They'll be knocked out by Game 6 in the 2nd round, at very best, but it would "help". If instead you define "enough" by standards that maybe Bergeron or Chara themselves would hold him, meaning giving them a REAL chance to compete for a Cup, then only an A guy or equivalent plus a B or C does the trick, IMO.
For my standards, I've never been about "renting" in the name of one season, and with the holes he's left/created on this team, I think doing so would be foolish. On the other hand, I have been about making a hockey trade to add a bona fide top 6 forward whom you plan to keep, either because they have term, or you will drop a bag of cash on them. That continues to be what I want to see. So a lot of the names in that B list have "Hey look, I made a trade so get off my back!" written all over them. Simmonds, Carter, etc. Those are Nash redux guys, maybe worse. That would be classic Bruins and right in lockstep with Sweeney's past, and thus it's exactly what I expect.
Update: Trade Thread #8
- Not a single "hockey trade" since Reilly Smith - Jimmy Hayes on July 1, 2015. Three and a half years ago.
Report: Maple Leafs have shown interest in NHL enforcer.
According to a report from The Athletic's Rick Carpiniello the Toronto Maple Leafs have expressed interest in none other than former Boston Bruins enforcer Adam McQuaid.
Report: Maple Leafs have shown interest in NHL enforcer.
According to a report from The Athletic's Rick Carpiniello the Toronto Maple Leafs have expressed interest in none other than former Boston Bruins enforcer Adam McQuaid.
THERE it is...Report: Maple Leafs have shown interest in NHL enforcer.
According to a report from The Athletic's Rick Carpiniello the Toronto Maple Leafs have expressed interest in none other than former Boston Bruins enforcer Adam McQuaid.
Chiarelli should be brought back just for that moment and then fired againHonestly, the NHL NEEDS a successful offersheet that results in pure spite and then the could put out a behind the scenes of the drama of it, 24: the offer sheet.
.02
Great. Extra 7th rounder from the Rangers if he's traded.
Tonight's a big game! I still think the Leafs are going to add a Ferland or Simmonds to add some grit to their top 9 in a potential 7 game series against us. They have already added Muzzin who's looking really good. Bruins can't afford to wait much longer. They need to not only separate from the pack (Mtl, Buf, Car, etc) I want them to catch the Leafs for 2nd in the division. I want home ice against those clowns. Just for fun, a crazy trade proposal
To Boston: Ryan Getzlaf (30% retained, cap hit of 5.7)
To Anaheim: Danton Heinen+ JFK+2nd rounder 2019
To Boston: Mark Stone
To Ottawa: Zach Senyshyn, Jeremy Lauzon, 1st 2020
Marshy-Bergy-Pasta
Celharik-Krejci-Stone
Debrusk-Getzlaf-Donato
Wagner-Backes-Kuraly
Rumor has it Tallon is trying to trade for Bobrovsky now (using Brassard & Reimer as part of the package) so he can sign Bob to an 8 year extension. That would give him...
Bobrovsky, at 30 years old with a .901 sv pct @ ~$8m per for 8 years
AND Luongo, at 39 years old with an .895 sv pct @ $4.5m per for 3 more years.
Report: Maple Leafs have shown interest in NHL enforcer.
According to a report from The Athletic's Rick Carpiniello the Toronto Maple Leafs have expressed interest in none other than former Boston Bruins enforcer Adam McQuaid.
I'm pretty sold on Dzingel at this point; plays the right side & would slot well next to Debrusk & Krejci to give us two good scoring lines.
The Nash deal was a good deal. Its not DS fault that he was injured, who knows what might of happened if he stayed healthy.
It’s just a matter of time.THERE it is...