Sorta weird post there. Don't know anyone here who dislikes the guy as a person. Most of his critics, like me, don't even blame him for his failings as much as we, rather, lay blame at those who acquired him for the money and term he was given. The likelihood that he would become slow and ineffective as he got older, while obvious to most rational people either in or out of the hockey world, somehow escaped Sweeney. As did the likelihood that a concussion was possible for a player like him in today's league. Sweeney likes to swing for the fences (see draft picks 13, 14, 15 in 2015 where he bucks conventional wisdom and doesn't use even one of them to get Barzal); he swung for the fences with Beleskey and Backes and the non-Barzal pick. We'd be a real contender now if he had just done the conventional thing. I'm a BU grad so I don't get the Harvard mindset, but I think there is some merit to the quip that they sometimes think they're smarter than everyone else.
Even without a concussion, I think "the game is basically done" with Backes. With a concussion, I clearly think "he should be done with the game", for the reasons you cite.
This was geared to the posters who fail to see the long term future of a fine gentleman and his family. I was conveying my perspective on growing older with kids. Versus why he should continue, he has had an excellent career and made millions. I also never mentioned anyone disliking him. It was in regards to some people who disliked hearing this point of view. They have their own reasons having him back playing, in my view they pale by comparison. I am sure Marc Savard would have another take on that whole debate on health versus wealth. When wealth in Backes case is not an issue at all. He has had 3 bad head shots in his last 10 games with us, 2 this year and one in the last game of the playoffs.
As for the player at first I was against it. I would have rather seen the money spent on Chara's replacement. Or a temporary stand in till the kids took over. We missed out on the better Blues player in Oshie and paid Backes for too long, Sweeney gambled on Beleskey and Backes they both had a good previous year.
He had to go that term, there was no way Backes would leave for less. At the time though Backes was a good player, natural decline added by the numerous head shots and the change of speed in the game made for what happened. I tried to like it and waited for the old Backes to emerge, there was sparks here and there but it never happened enough to justify that contract.
As for Barzal, well he is a very good player but is coming back to earth this year. I think he wanted nothing to do with a Claude coached team. The kid is all offence, even now he is what a -7 after 8 games with 3 even strength points. He probably looked at how we treated another high scoring center in Seguin. He seen how he was bounced around and never got the position and benched off and on.
There was no way Barzal would have put up those numbers last year with us. He would have been on the 2nd power play if that. He would have been 3rd line center but no way he gets ice above Bergy and Krech. He would have had a decent campaign but not close to what he was allowed to do with the Isles run and gun system. Long term yeah sure he would be nice to have. For whatever reason that looks like a miss, over all Sweeney has done good by me.
Any news on McAvoy? I hope it has noting to do with his heart and just the few crosschecks he took from McDavid and that hit he took from Looch at the last second. Looch also caught Backes late in the game with a hard hit, that stunned him.