CHRDANHUTCH
Registered User
and what franchise did Sweeney oversee..... hint.... the team currently @ NESCPeter Chiarelli
?
and what franchise did Sweeney oversee..... hint.... the team currently @ NESCPeter Chiarelli
?
and what franchise did Sweeney oversee..... hint.... the team currently @ NESC
whatIT happened in DC....
WHY did you think Washington hired Cassidy there. and Nashville and Poile hired Trotz when they started there.....now you know why Trotz walked from Washington to the Islanders, correct....
Chiarelli inherited a lot of talentI am glad that was brought up though.
I always mentioned that Sweeney inherited Rask, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Marchand, Chara, Krejci, Krug, Hamilton, Lucic..I forget he also inherited Bruce Cassidy.
That 2011 team would not have done anything without netting Pevs, Kelly and even Kaberle before the deadline. The team that was playing bad needed a huge commitment from their GM at the time and he did just that....will ours?
there may not be a choice here
I am glad that was brought up though.
I always mentioned that Sweeney inherited Rask, Pastrnak, Bergeron, Marchand, Chara, Krejci, Krug, Hamilton, Lucic..I forget he also inherited Bruce Cassidy.
I'd say there's a difference in attitude. Chiarelli went for it then because he wanted to. Sweeney would do it now because he needs to in order to keep his job. I'm not sure if that's a person you want making those deals where they have nothing to lose.
Also Gryz, Bjork, Heinen (turned iicnto Ritchie) and Donato (turned into Coyle).
He also inherited zero defensive prospects really and has done a great job there, but has drafted any impact forwards as of yet, although DeBrusk was at one point IMO. Weird thing is every forward prospect they seem to have hits a peak and falls off a cliff.
Peter Chiarelli
?
Wasn't it John Ferguson Jr.?
I mean he was the GM for Prov back then
I’m coach I do this to get short & long termCan't coach up garbage all the time. Maybe it's time they actual;ly addressed the fact that nobody other than their top line can score in this league?
I know this may not be a popular opinion but , I am the point where at least short term, the best thing the Bruins could do for any success this year would be to let Bruce go.
Get rid of Neely, too. Or at the very least, demote him back to being a figurehead who shakes hands with sponsors and acts like a maniac when the team scores goals in the playoffs. A mediocre hockey mind who has signed off on several bad moves.Firing Sweeney and making Bruce coach/gm is what I'm leaning towards.
Bruce's presser today, still looks pissed.
I get that criticism, but Bruce isn't the one who has been picking out the groceries and has whiffed on UFA signings and slam-dunk draft picks. It's not like he's Belichick who is GM and Coach. You could put just about any coach on this team and the results might be even worse than they are now. Bruce has done a solid job coaching a one-line team over the last 4-5 years.It's so odd that the bottom three lines all do this crap, no matter the personnel. It's not just this year, either. I certainly don't disagree with him, but he HAS been the coach while this has been an ongoing issue. Kind of reminds me of the NHL not doing shit about Tim Peel for years, then all of a sudden noticing he's a POS ref.
Certainly he has done a good job in some areas, but I still maintain on the subject of perimeter shooting (which influences lack of 5v5 scoring) that he has to be held culpable to a large extent. The evidence more than backs this up. There are teams with much worse personnel than the Bs that still find a way to go to the net to get goals better than the Bs. Agree that DS has dropped the ball, but there has been enough on the roster the past couple years to at least be able to engage in better driving to the net and scoring 5v5 goals. The shot charts some games are just flat out embarrassing. If it's not the offensive system at play on this issue, then that means pretty much the entire team is ignoring the coaching staff, which is obviously not a good thing. Either way, things need to change.I get that criticism, but Bruce isn't the one who has been picking out the groceries and has whiffed on UFA signings and slam-dunk draft picks. It's not like he's Belichick who is GM and Coach. You could put just about any coach on this team and the results might be even worse than they are now. Bruce has done a solid job coaching a one-line team over the last 4-5 years.
Firing Sweeney and making Bruce coach/gm is what I'm leaning towards.
Bruce's presser today, still looks pissed.
'Firing Sweeney and making Bruce coach/gm is what I'm leaning towards.
Bruce's presser today, still looks pissed.
When’s the last time there was a coach/gm in the NHL? Seems like a thing of the past.'
You don't want to do that. Coach/GM hasn't worked in a really long time.
I believe Bruce is a very good coach. Keep him.
It's SweenNeely who should go if things fall apart. But, I doubt that will happen. They probably have one more season to burn.
It's also uncommon for managment to change hands while a coach stays, as the new guys want their choice.
We shall see.
That 2011 team would not have done anything without netting Pevs, Kelly and even Kaberle before the deadline. The team that was playing bad needed a huge commitment from their GM at the time and he did just that....will ours?