I don't really have a problem with keeping the coach if you're going to make some personnel changes. It just seemed like after failing to reach the finals for so long with the current group that it was time for some sort of change to be made and yet they seemed so hell bent on keeping everything the same.
It's really the combination of Dupuis and Bylsma that becomes the problem. Dupuis can be one of the best 3rd liners in the game if used properly. The problem is Bylsma marries himself to certain guys being in certain roles. Dupuis = Top Line in DB's mind and Glass + Adams = his 4th line. A guy like Vitale will always take the blame and get healthy scratched when that line inevitably struggles when we all know Glass and Adams are what bogs that line down.
Part of the first step in an actual culture change should be canning Ray Shero for those moves.
And maybe a bad team like Florida or Buffalo would take a Dupuis type. And Niskanen and/or Orpik are certainly moveable.
Then we go from there.
And, it happens with all of them the same way. They start trying to do too much because 'being themselves' no longer cuts it, which is turn puts them into a spin towards mediocrity, which is turn reinforces the temptation to try to do it all, which in turn makes things worse.
That's why you juggle lines in hockey. Sometimes, there's no rational explanation for why a spin starts, but you sure as **** have an obligation as a coach to do everything in your power to stop it.
There's just something missing with this team. I don't think it's one thing either. I don't put it all on coaching. I think there's some personnel issues that are just as big.
It doesn't help that Sid, Dupuis, Malkin, Bennett and many others are slumping. Neal and Malkin have not looked anywhere near the same since Kunitz was taken off their line a couple seasons ago. I think this team needs a big shakeup. It probably should have happened in the off-season looking back at it. I can understand that they thought they had a great regular season and wanted to keep a lot of the components together but the supporting cast probably should have been overhauled in the summer.
It's the forwards that are killing us. Not that Niskanen and Orpik are indispensible or anything and they give us some cap space if we can find takers, but they're pretty low on the list of reasons why this team can't win games (unless we want to point to Orpik's "leadership").
In terms of return, Sutter's the guy I look at first. Don't care how many points he had last night. He's cheap, he's young, a stiff breeze will push him back, he doesn't give a flying care about winning and nobody around the league has realized that yet. He can bring return. Sell on him before people see past the guy's last name and his value plummets.
Who will be the scapegoat for tonight?
I don't really have a problem with keeping the coach if you're going to make some personnel changes. It just seemed like after failing to reach the finals for so long with the current group that it was time for some sort of change to be made and yet they seemed so hell bent on keeping everything the same.
It's really the combination of Dupuis and Bylsma that becomes the problem. Dupuis can be one of the best 3rd liners in the game if used properly. The problem is Bylsma marries himself to certain guys being in certain roles. Dupuis = Top Line in DB's mind and Glass + Adams = his 4th line. A guy like Vitale will always take the blame and get healthy scratched when that line inevitably struggles when we all know Glass and Adams are what bogs that line down.
Yes, I agree. Been saying for a while that Sutter is expendable. But we do also need to move a D-man...a VETERAN D-man. I don't care which one, at this point. It's beyond ridiculous that ONE of Despres and Bortuzzo aren't regulars right now, Olli Maatta or no Olli Maatta.
Yes, I agree. Been saying for a while that Sutter is expendable. But we do also need to move a D-man...a VETERAN D-man. I don't care which one, at this point. It's beyond ridiculous that Despres and Bortuzzo aren't regulars right now, Olli Maatta or no Olli Maatta.
That guy not playing is all on the coach. Engelland can't play back there any more. Not with this team's depth. And certainly not over Bortuzzo.
More that I think about it, might be worth moving Orpik just to change the mentality. Shoot a hostage, so to speak.
Trading Niskanen and Dupuis, as has been suggested, for reasons of "sending a message," sends no message at all. "Hey guys, if you do your best but you're not good enough, you're gone."
Better to chuck a D with an A and a forward that clearly doesn't care.
I honestly don't care who we'd move from that group...one of Orpik or Niskanen, and one of Sutter or Dupuis...I'd gladly take just about any 2-for-1 deal where we'd get a top-six winger for two of the four.
This isn't about trades and FA signings, which Shero has gotten into heavily but not recognizing that coaching changes happen in the NHL for a reason. Laviolette, Tortorella and Vigneault have all gotten fired recently for far less failure that Bylsma has made this franchise endure.
That guy not playing is all on the coach. Engelland can't play back there any more. Not with this team's depth. And certainly not over Bortuzzo.
More that I think about it, might be worth moving Orpik just to change the mentality. Shoot a hostage, so to speak.
Trading Niskanen and Dupuis, as has been suggested, for reasons of "sending a message," sends no message at all. "Hey guys, if you do your best but you're not good enough, you're gone." Would just institute a feeling of fatalism, imo.
Better to chuck a D with an A and a forward that clearly doesn't care.
Oh man, imagine if the Penguins didn't have Crosby and Malkin. The Penguins would be Predators East.
How's that working out for those teams?
It'll take this team getting swept out of the 1st round for you to consider canning DB. So that's pointless to discuss.
But what personnel moves would you make? Line changes? Malkin isn't getting out of this "funk" anytime soon. You aren't winning a Cup without him. And the longer this goes on, the more troubling it becomes.