DonnyNucker
Registered User
- Mar 28, 2017
- 4,002
- 2,896
Interesting take.Anything to avoid criticizing the Canucks management and staff eh?
Interesting take.Anything to avoid criticizing the Canucks management and staff eh?
Tweaked his groin again. Saw this one coming a mile away. You don’t play through groin pain.
Our medical staff coming up bush league once again.
IDK about you guys, but sitting him as frequently as they have been this season is telling me that they are being cautious with him. Brock wants to play and played through the rest of the game in Colorado without much issue. If anything it's the training staff keeping him off.
Banning was on SN650 today, and he said that the scans for Boeser were negative since the beginning, so it was about Boeser playing through the pain. That's the dialogue going on. Essentially, he hasn't suffered an injury, technically, yet he hasn't recovered to the point where he is fully healthy either.
Guessing we won't be seeing Boeser until at least November 17th:
https://www.tsn.ca/ice-chips-boeser-flying-home-from-boston-1.1206217
The team's doing the right thing here just as they were when they sat Pettersson for an extra bit.
Now they need to call up Dahlen and get him in there with his buddy, move Eriksson down, and sit Liepsic.
But is it worth it if he severely re-injures it again? Miss 5 games now to hopefully play all year. Or play now get hurt and miss 20 games. It's a double edged sword that can cut you either way but I think taking the precautions route is the smart route with a groin injury that doesn't take much to re-tweak.Why is it so hard for posters to believe that its Boeser thats obviously been wanting to play through this.. its a contract year !!
Put yourself in that position. Theres millions of dollars on the line for him. The tests said negative so obviously he wants to play.
If anything, its the management and training staff that is saying enough is enough.
i for one am SHOCKED that it got worse
There was a star player back in the 90's, you may or may not have heard of him, named Jamomir Jagr. He had a groin injury, and played though it. It also devastated his career to the point where he was forced to quit the game altogether, he certainly didn't play over 1700 games, that's for sure.Sitting him on and off for short rests instead of completely sidelining him and letting him go through a proper recovery regimen isn’t being cautious and proactive, it’s doing the bare minimum.
The fact that he keeps needing to sit out demonstrates that he should’ve just been given a period of time to go through a rehab regimen and get 100% healthy instead of playing a few games, resting, then playing again, without ever fixing his lingering issues.
Ah yes because your 100+ point superstar playing through injury in the playoffs when his team needed help (he missed 4 previous games btw) is immediately comparable to at best a bubble team (likely bottom feeder) competing for points in October and November.
And Paul Kariya can tell you a lot about other injuries that can crop up when you are nursing a different injury instead of letting it heal. So can countless other players.
And I don't think I see anyone saying playing is going to cause him long term or cost him his career. Just that it makes almost zero sense for this team to not let him heal.
I’m actually seriously worried that these injuries could linger throughout his career.
Actually...
The guy I quoted did say that.
I don't believe that it's a groin injury. It's probably his back and that crosscheck from Calvert re-aggravated it.