Player Discussion Brendan Smith

Status
Not open for further replies.

ColonialsHockey10

Registered User
Jul 22, 2007
15,170
4,695
He's still not the sharpest tool in the shed even though he's getting by.

But he's certainly not McDonagh-level moronic either. McDonagh has long stretches where it looks like he's never seen a hockey game before and doesn't know the rules.

We have to have the dumbest defense in the league.

Dumbest TEAM in the league. No need to be modest, Machinehead.
 

gorangers0525

Registered User
Dec 15, 2014
2,751
687
To say McDonagh sucks is unreasonable, but he is quite a bit overrated IMO. His defensive positioning in front of his own net is hilariously bad at times and he is too inconsistent for me to consider him a top 15 defenseman. There are plenty of lesser talked about defenseman that provide a similar impact that most wouldn't consider top 15. Guy is still living off his 13/14 playoffs reputation.

Smith is a good middle pairing D.
 

gorangers0525

Registered User
Dec 15, 2014
2,751
687
How would an excel spreadsheet tell someone if a player is "dumb"? There's no dumb/60 metric. "dumb" is something you need to watch a player to think that they are.


I'm convinced that most "eye test" advocates don't watch the game either, they just go by reputation. If a player has a good season it takes like 3 seasons of meh play for them to re-evaluate their positions lol.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
41,881
52,238
In High Altitoad
How would an excel spreadsheet tell someone if a player is "dumb"? There's no dumb/60 metric. "dumb" is something you need to watch a player to think that they are.

This is true, but I often wonder what the **** MH is watching :laugh:

Harping on a guy because hes posted less than optimal corsi numbers away from Girardi while failing to take into account that hes playing on his offside with an even far more inferior player (Staal) is just the surface of it all. I don't give 2 ***** what the numbers say, if anyone says his last 2 games were poor, they're blind or just don't understand the game at all.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

Drury and Laviolette Must Go
Dec 8, 2013
57,750
23,694
New York
So since this is the Smith thread and Geoff Gorden criticized me, why don't you tell me why I'm wrong that Smith is a dumb player?
 

gorangers0525

Registered User
Dec 15, 2014
2,751
687
This is true, but I often wonder what the **** MH is watching :laugh:

Harping on a guy because hes posted less than optimal corsi numbers away from Girardi while failing to take into account that hes playing on his offside with an even far more inferior player (Staal) is just the surface of it all. I don't give 2 ***** what the numbers say, if anyone says his last 2 games were poor, they're blind or just don't understand the game at all.

Would you consider him a top ten defenseman in the league?

I do agree his main partners this season have been atrocious...but he just seems to get lost in his own zone a lot. Granted, this could be due to him having to play both ld/rd at the same time.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
41,881
52,238
In High Altitoad
So since this is the Smith thread and Geoff Gorden criticized me, why don't you tell me why I'm wrong that Smith is a dumb player?

Simple answer: He isn't.

More complex answer: Hes done nothing to indicate that he is of below average hockey IQ. He hasn't been egregiously guilty of losing coverage, has done a fair job jumping into the play offensively and actually doing something positive with the puck when its on his stick, hes won board battles more often than not (this isn't an IQ thing, but its worth mentioning) and hes pretty good at moving the puck to an open winger against aggressive forecheckers allowing this team to do basically the only thing it excels at.

This isn't an easy system to step into and play in as a D either, and he hasn't looked remotely out of place (hes looked good overall.) If he were a dumb player, I think he'd be struggling a bit more.

I haven't seen all the bad penalties either (he got whistled for one last game that was complete bull ****.) I've counted one tripping call that was lazy but thats it.


Would you consider him a top ten defenseman in the league?

I do agree his main partners this season have been atrocious...but he just seems to get lost in his own zone a lot. Granted, this could be due to him having to play both ld/rd at the same time.

10? No, 20? Yes.

Get him a real partner and you'll see most of his critics do an about face real quick.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

Drury and Laviolette Must Go
Dec 8, 2013
57,750
23,694
New York
Simple answer: He isn't.

More complex answer: Hes done nothing to indicate that he is of below average hockey IQ. He hasn't been egregiously guilty of losing coverage, has done a fair job jumping into the play offensively and actually doing something positive with the puck when its on his stick, hes won board battles more often than not (this isn't an IQ thing, but its worth mentioning) and hes pretty good at moving the puck to an open winger against aggressive forecheckers allowing this team to do basically the only thing it excels at.

This isn't an easy system to step into and play in as a D either, and he hasn't looked remotely out of place (hes looked good overall.) If he were a dumb player, I think he'd be struggling a bit more.

I haven't seen all the bad penalties either (he got whistled for one last game that was complete bull ****.) I've counted one tripping call that was lazy but thats it.

Most of those things you mentioned don't relate to hockey IQ, they relate to his tool-kit, which I have said is very good. I could understand why he was highly touted as a prospect, but there's a reason why this guy has a lower career PPG average than Marc Staal. He has all these tools, but has not put any of it together to become a top 3 D. The guy was getting scratched for Detroit this year. Think about that. Maybe the worst defense in the whole NHL he couldn't even keep a place on.

One of the criticisms Detroit fans had of this guy, and it wasn't just one or two fans, it was a lot of them, was that he has a pretty much non-exist hockey IQ, and I can see that. More games will give me a better idea, but I think I've seen a lot of it early on. In the first game, I think he threw two back passes in his own zone right into the slot that easily could've been goals. In the next game, he proceeded to do the same thing. And maybe some of these issues were system-related, but thats an example of what I mean. He also has incredibly high penalty minutes like every year. Unless he's a boxer, and I'm pretty sure he's not, why would a defenseman have such high penalty minutes? They are astronomically high like every single year.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
41,881
52,238
In High Altitoad
Most of those things you mentioned don't relate to hockey IQ, they relate to his tool-kit, which I have said is very good. I could understand why he was highly touted as a prospect, but there's a reason why this guy has a lower career PPG average than Marc Staal. He has all these tools, but has not put any of it together to become a top 3 D. The guy was getting scratched for Detroit this year. Think about that. Maybe the worst defense in the whole NHL he couldn't even keep a place on.

One of the criticisms Detroit fans had of this guy, and it wasn't just one or two fans, it was a lot of them, was that he has a pretty much non-exist hockey IQ, and I can see that. More games will give me a better idea, but I think I've seen a lot of it early on. In the first game, I think he threw two back passes in his own zone right into the slot that easily could've been goals. In the next game, he proceeded to do the same thing. And maybe some of these issues were system-related, but thats an example of what I mean. He also has incredibly high penalty minutes like every year. Unless he's a boxer, and I'm pretty sure he's not, why would a defenseman have such high penalty minutes? They are astronomically high like every single year.

Almost all of those things are decision making skills which are directly related to hockey IQ.


He's a bit of a hot head so I'd guess that a lot of those penalties are of an aggressive nature (His PIM totals arent that high BTW.) Throwing passes up the middle isn't in and of it self a bad thing (and I'm not even sure those things were passes, our D have a habit of just slapping the puck up the middle for no reason, Staal is the biggest culprit of this) but as others have said, when someone handles the puck more, they'll make more mistakes with it. I'll take the clean break outs with the occasional blunder over the 90% probability that you'll get a turn over, failed clear or hapless lob out of your own end that you'll get from others.
 

NickyFotiu

NYR 2024 Cup Champs!
Sep 29, 2011
14,651
6,288
In a salary cap world, picks are gold. Especially to an organization whose farm system is among the most barren in the league.

I understand your thinking but I feel its a bit of an over generalization. If you said top 5 picks are gold I might agree. Maybe even the top 10. Are 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th round picks really gold? They are very simple to obtain so teams do not look at them as gold IMO.
 

TheGuarantee

Registered User
Jul 1, 2016
1,012
95
How would an excel spreadsheet tell someone if a player is "dumb"? There's no dumb/60 metric. "dumb" is something you need to watch a player to think that they are.

Saying McDonagh is a dumb player is a ridiculous notion considering he is a whole d pairing himself. Funny that you'd be the one to respond to that comment though.
 

Machinehead

GoAwayTrouba
Jan 21, 2011
142,898
113,907
NYC
Everyone was so wrapped up in the non goalie interference call in Carolina that we forget that McDonagh was literally staring off into the distance not sure where to be on that play.

One example of many. He's a talented player but hockey IQ is low on the list.
 

Boruto

.
Jun 27, 2011
15,627
436
Let's get back to topic. I think Brenden has a few Cam Talbot facial features. With a beanie on especially.
 

Revel

Dark Sky Enthusiast
Oct 20, 2015
6,189
243
Dunning–Krugerville
McDonagh+ for Manson?

Robbing Peter to pay Paul, despite our LHD depth. I'd prefer to deal from a different position of strength (forward) to get our RHD, if at all possible. Or we can just try and snag one from Europe or something...not that I'd know who'd be available and willing to cross the pond.
 

Mikos87

Registered User
Mar 19, 2002
9,064
3,244
Visit site
I like certain parts of his game. This is a guy that needs the right coach on D. Buek really needs to grill in on the defense for playing soft.

Smith has that edge and the mobility to go along with it.

Smith is a guy that may pair well with Klein with a defined area of play and communication.

Nothing wrong with having a good Mimico boy on the team.

The turnovers are what gets me. Say the Ranger keep Klein and Smith on the third pair next year:

McD-Shatty
Skjei-Holden
Smith-Klein
Heed

Buyout G. Trade Staal.
Skjei & Holden make that possible cap wise. Say Smith is at $3.65, and Klein at $2.9. All of a sudden the Rangers don't look so bad with Shatty making $6.5.

That also let's the forwards stick around and give you more cap space for your 1-Year upgrades.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad