He PK's well and that's pretty much it?
Keep fighting the good fight.
He PK's well and that's pretty much it?
Keep fighting the good fight.
Pretty much.
He has zero playmaking skills, hence why he has no chemistry with any other player and any line he anchors becomes an offensive blackhole.
I am not even sure how good he is in a Malholtra role because he is in a way being sheltered by Horvat, which is ridiculous.
Pretty much.
He has zero playmaking skills, hence why he has no chemistry with any other player and any line he anchors becomes an offensive blackhole.
I am not even sure how good he is in a Malholtra role because he is in a way being sheltered by Horvat, which is ridiculous.
He isn't the best playmaker but he fits this team perfectly. He doesn't bleed goals while on the ice, and is a great defensive player. Since the canucks have such horrible secondary scoring at this point, he works out perfectly. We can't count on an offensive outburst from any line but the first, so if we can limit the damage when playing the other lines that is just great. Sutter will also chip in some offense, although not at the production level others are hoping for.
His value lies in his ability to make the lines he's playing against also look like black holes.
Can you give me a specific game or games that exemplifies Sutter being sheltered. Its easy to thru the NHL shift charts to see how each team used their lines to confirm or deny this narrative.
-also i thought it was known quality of comp data is flawed because of how it allocates value to players.
@work, can't really find the time to dig into it that much.
He is not even the guy that is counted on to shut things down, Horvat is. If he is used as a shutdown center, then yeah that would be great. He is not and don't be mistaken about that. He is given an offensive role, and he is not producing.
Kind of funny how it always seems to work for the Canucks though. Sutter had missed 3 games combined in the last 5 seasons and now he's out for almost 2 months 16 games into his time in Vancouver.
He isn't the best playmaker but he fits this team perfectly. He doesn't bleed goals while on the ice, and is a great defensive player. Since the canucks have such horrible secondary scoring at this point, he works out perfectly. We can't count on an offensive outburst from any line but the first, so if we can limit the damage when playing the other lines that is just great. Sutter will also chip in some offense, although not at the production level others are hoping for.
Regime apologists are already claiming that Sutter's injury has derailed the season....but gimme a break....guy wasn't actually lighting it up when he went down....and Desjardins couldn't find any wingers to play with him either.....it's shocking really where the 'Nucks find themselves in the middle....McCann wasn't even supposed to be here and Cracknell was a Utica signing who willed his way on to the roster....and now that Horvat has hit the wall, it's Sedin or bust....this tire-fire really belongs to Jimbo...He had to let Richardson and Mathias walk for cap reasons and then watch his other "big signing" Vey morph into an AHL journeyman.
Ever play dominos?
It's clear that Sutter was never going to replace Kesler's 41 goal season (either was Kesler btw). It's also clear that Horvat isn't quite ready to take on the 2nd line C role. Sutter was/is the stop gap in Horvat's transition. His injury has forced Horvat and McCann into roles they are not quite ready for.
I find it funny that the collective was moaning so strongly at JB for not going fast enough to a youth movement but when he is forced to go more quickly, that same collective is moaning about lack of depth...
Basically he's the player Pittsburgh fans told us he is, nothing more nothing less. And that would be fine, but Benning is operating under the impression that he's a lot more and now that's what we're paying for.
Benning did not plan to have good enough centre depth to deal with injuries this season.
The plan was Henrik-Sutter-Horvat-Vey
McCann and Cracknell ended up forcing their way on the roster which helps but still doesn't solve the problem. Retaining a proven NHL guy who can play centre or move to the wing like Richardson or Matthias would have went a long way in helping us deal with injuries that happen every year.
Depth down the middle and on the backend are the most important areas for a team and somehow Benning managed to downgrade in both areas. For all the talk about development, this management is watching Horvat founder in too large of a role because they neglected to get the players to properly insulate him. Completely inexcusable.
Really probably time to stop trumpeting "what Penguin fan say" Who cares at this point.
We saw our own sample for a few games before this injury. I didnt see a star but I saw some good things. Good speed and skating, which this team DESPERATELY needs, Sutter has decent skill and some good puck handling moves, can rush to the net, good defensively.
Think he is missed on the PK???
And Penguin fans said he was soft as butter. I didn't see that. I did not see an abrasive player but I saw a player who did not shy away from contact, I saw a player who does go to the boards to finish his check.
Did Gillis leave great center depth for Benning to inherit? He left the #2 center demanding out of here to a trade to one team and nothing behind. No young centers ready for a significant role because he couldn't draft any in 6 years.
I hated acquiring Bonino in trade, jury out on Sutter. Point is though, basically the same point the Benning blasters always overlook. The state of the team, the organizational depth was left in a worse state by the Gillis regime than most of you understand or are willing to admit.
No GM was going to come in here and fix it in 16 months. Benning took over and aging team in decline, with a void of good NHL prospects.
Gillis left plenty of options both down the middle and on the backend. Richardson, Santorelli, Matthias, Garrison, Stanton etc. Furthermore, Benning had ample opportunity to get better centres and defensemen, but chose not to. Getting guys like Prust, Dorsett, Miller, Sbisa, Sutter, Vey Baertschi all hurt our centre and defensive depth,.
Regime apologists are already claiming that Sutter's injury has derailed the season....but gimme a break....guy wasn't actually lighting it up when he went down....and Desjardins couldn't find any wingers to play with him either.....it's shocking really where the 'Nucks find themselves in the middle....McCann wasn't even supposed to be here and Cracknell was a Utica signing who willed his way on to the roster....and now that Horvat has hit the wall, it's Sedin or bust....this tire-fire really belongs to Jimbo...He had to let Richardson and Mathias walk for cap reasons and then watch his other "big signing" Vey morph into an AHL journeyman.
Good Post...so true.Ever play dominos?
It's clear that Sutter was never going to replace Kesler's 41 goal season (either was Kesler btw). It's also clear that Horvat isn't quite ready to take on the 2nd line C role. Sutter was/is the stop gap in Horvat's transition. His injury has forced Horvat and McCann into roles they are not quite ready for.
I find it funny that the collective was moaning so strongly at JB for not going fast enough to a youth movement but when he is forced to go more quickly, that same collective is moaning about lack of depth...
Good Post...so true.
In the pre season Horvat was already anointed the 40-50 pt 2C around here while JB cautioned about the sophomore slump and increased responsibilities being hard to handle.
Sutter was a huge loss because it coincided with Horvat hitting rock bottom from what I've seen of his game this last month.
Sutter was/is the stop gap in Horvat's transition.