Boston Pens no goal call

[BHD]

NBC announcers upset with a call against the Pens? Shocker...

[MOD]

Anyways, terrible call. Not surprising this season though.

 

[10coach*]

How was it the right call? McQuaid hit Sill into Rask.

Sill's already into Rask's ice well before being tapped by McQuaid anyways which is exactly where the puck went into the net.

 

[ecemleafs]

bad call. to be honest i really dont know what the ref was looking at. if he sees the goalie contact he has to see the bruins defender with his stick up around the pens players next and then shoving him into rask.

 

[777]

Now a high stick goalie by Bergeron in OT, under review

edit: good goal. Bruins double dipped tonight

 

[penguins2946*]

Sill's already into Rask's ice well before being tapped by McQuaid anyways which is exactly where the puck went into the net.

You are allowed to be in the crease if you're not interfering with the goalie.

 

[Dacks]

Well that's two wrong calls now. Two goal swing from the zebras.

 

[H382]

With the way this game is going, that non goal might turn out to be pretty huge..

Happens to everyone now and again tho.

I hate when I'm right.

Rough night for the Pens. Dominated the game, didn't get the calls.

 

[JWells16]

Well... I'm going to go ahead and get out of this thread. 1 questionable call is tough to overcome. 2? That's tough.

 

[darkbrew*]

pens get jobbed by the nhl again

 

[The Dangly One]

Now a high stick goalie by Bergeron in OT, under review

edit: good goal. Bruins double dipped tonight

I'm not even sure the puck touched Bergerons stick

 

[66-30-33]

That was a clear high stick.

 

[BHD]

Are the regular Pens posters allowed to make up some crazy conspiracy like the league wanting the Bruins to win?

 

[Frederick Stanley]

If they wanna call it inconclusive fine by me, but below the crossbar? wtf...

 

[PensFreak]

That second one was really bad... Claiming that the puck made contact with the stick below the crossbar? It made contact at about his head height... and while he was bent over, he was still standing firmly above 4' tall.

 

[penguins2946*]

If they wanna call it inconclusive fine by me, but below the crossbar? wtf...

Yeah that's where I'm at. If they say "there wasn't enough evidence to overturn it", I would have been fine with that. But this? It blatantly looked like it was above the crossbar.

 

[H382]

I'm not even sure the puck touched Bergerons stick

I'm pretty sure you see the puck go over the glove, which only means the stick HAD to have deflected it. The refs said it hit the stick, but below the crossbar. Which I think is BS.

 

[10coach*]

You are allowed to be in the crease if you're not interfering with the goalie.

I'd have to watch it again but isn't Sill well into the crease? Seems like he would have interfered regardless if he was pushed or not as Rask would have kicked his pad out to attempt to save the puck. Just my view as a ref

 

[PensFreak]

I'm not even sure the puck touched Bergerons stick

You could see on the overhead view that Despres missed it, and it definitely changed direction.

If they wanna call it inconclusive fine by me, but below the crossbar? wtf...

That's what I'm saying. It looked at least a few inches high, but making a definitive statement like that is pretty obtuse when it's such a close call.

 

[Son Goku]

What a joke. From every angle it was above the line.

 

[Ragamuffin Gunner]

Refs hand the game to the Bs.

Gall off a bad goal in the 2nd then this ********. Awful, awful call.

 

[Hisch13r]

How can the puck be deflected down and go right under the crossbar if the stick was under the crossbar?

 

[BudMovin*]

League is conspiring against the Bruins getting McDavid.

 

[ThatQuietGuy93]

It was actually of despres glove

 

[H382]

How can the puck be deflected down and go right under the crossbar if the stick was under the crossbar?

Magic puck

 

[H382]

It was actually of despres glove

It went over his glove.