KIRK
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 109,700
- 51,216
It's fate!
Fate would be Milbury replacing Julien behind the bench for the series.
It's fate!
Matt Cooke doesn't post on HFBoards.
2013 - Eastern Conference Finals: Pens 0 Bruins 0 - Go home embarrassed by depth, depth, and more depth. Penguins haven't seen depth this impressive since...
(Kirk, going to need you to finish this sentence, I value my avatar too much)
2013 - Eastern Conference Finals: Pens 0 Bruins 0 - Go home embarrassed by depth, depth, and more depth. Penguins haven't seen depth this impressive since...
(Kirk, going to need you to finish this sentence, I value my avatar too much)
It was a dirty play. However, I love Matt Cooke. He's hilarious to watch.
What does that even mean Bruins fans hate the Pens fans who stick up for Cooke/
Cooke was just finishing his check.
i think you need a cartoon Ulfie avatar...or find a way to incorporate this gif:
It was a dirty play. However, I love Matt Cooke. He's hilarious to watch.
I swear, the worst thing about internet discussion is the "Two Extremes" blinders that settle in over discussion.
It's like we're playing by the "Rules for Radicals" here.
The idea that if you don't say that X is going to steamroll Y, then you're saying that Y is going to steamroll X.
Come on, it doesn't work that way. Their fanbase is still going to hate us even if we all say that Boston is superior and will pick us apart as if they were the Red Wings of the 90s.
They're good, and they can beat us, yes. We can also beat them.
I have no idea how many games the series will go, and frankly, at this point before it has even started (and assuming that the Rangers don't came back, which they still could), I don't particularly care how many it goes.
It's going to go however long it goes, and whoever wins is whoever wins.
Their fanbase isn't going to like us no matter how much any of us supplicates ourselves and espouses their superiority, so it's a waste of time. There's a case to be made for either team.
Waiting sucks.
I swear, the worst thing about internet discussion is the "Two Extremes" blinders that settle in over discussion.
It's like we're playing by the "Rules for Radicals" here.
The idea that if you don't say that X is going to steamroll Y, then you're saying that Y is going to steamroll X.
Come on, it doesn't work that way. Their fanbase is still going to hate us even if we all say that Boston is superior and will pick us apart as if they were the Red Wings of the 90s.
They're good, and they can beat us, yes. We can also beat them.
I have no idea how many games the series will go, and frankly, at this point before it has even started (and assuming that the Rangers don't came back, which they still could), I don't particularly care how many it goes.
It's going to go however long it goes, and whoever wins is whoever wins.
Their fanbase isn't going to like us no matter how much any of us supplicates ourselves and espouses their superiority, so it's a waste of time. There's a case to be made for either team.
Waiting sucks.
Cmon, the Rangers are WEAK. They won one game with 2 fluke goals, they're done.Awesome post
Wish there were more posters like this on all boards (including the Bruins).
Now let's see what happens today.....like I've said, you guys still don't know who you're facing.
FYI the Cooke hit on savard was a "legal" hit according to the rules of the time.
FYI the Cooke hit on savard was a "legal" hit according to the rules of the time.
How was it not a clean hit at the time? There were no rules against blindsiding or hitting the head, and he didn't use his elbow.