Wow you're pretty worked up over this.
No, I'm saying collectively, the Pens, Rags etc. don't produce more than the B's top 6. Individually obviously they are better players, but they have a weaker supporting cast. (Which by the way is in direct contradiction to your argument that they are less likely to be impacted by a key injury).
Your whole argument is that the B's need a healthy and high producing bottom 6 because their top 6 can't compete offensively with the other contenders. And it's simply false, and while you keep saying "hard fact" over and over, you have yet to provide a single one of them (or at least a relevant one). If you were to say the B's top3 or top 2 or hell even top 1 I'd agree, but that has nothing to do with what your argument.
So I guess, no I don't think Horton is better than Crosby, Malkin, Nash, Gaborik, Richards blah blah blah ... and I've never suggested otherwise.