Rabid Ranger
2 is better than one
I think there is a lot of unnecessary hand wringing over Wheeler's next deal. The Jets will take care of him and deal with his "twilight years" when it gets to that point
I just don’t see that many guys left in the nhl who were drafted between 1997 to 2001 this past year. Age range in 2018 for those guys would be 35 to 39.Obviously a 7 or 8 year deal for him would be tremendously front-loaded.
I just don’t see that many guys left in the nhl who were drafted between 1997 to 2001 this past year. Age range in 2018 for those guys would be 35 to 39.
Just have to be realistic about how many good years wheeler has left. If you hand him a long term deal you do so knowing that it will cost maybe a 2nd round pick or mid level prospect to send him to another team with 2-3 years left on his deal.
I figure that's the type of contract he'll want.Obviously a 7 or 8 year deal for him would be tremendously front-loaded.
Wheeler is hated in Arizona.
This is a good question whether or not he stays.
But this is my take: he stated in an interview he goes to prove himself every single day. I also know he loves it in Winnipeg, but for all we know, he could be asking for dumb money within the next day. I mean I could see him getting offered $7M AAV for eight years, a contract that is flexed through the portion of his career if it locks him up in Winnipeg. But you never know, he might be a team guy and ask for low money. Although, his trade value is very high after this season. I expect him to have a better one next season. I'd love him to retire a Jet, he rocks 26 beautifully.
One thing I will say is if Vancouver did manage to get a hold of him before he was traded to the Thrashers, he would've worked amazingly with the Sedins.
I'll just pretend he wants out of Winnipeg and gets traded to Florida for Barkov. I think straight up would do it, but if any team is likely to add in this case-scenario, Winnipeg would.
Other than the Jets, I see him playing for the Rangers.
It kind of reminds me of the Burns situation. Could easily have a similar contract term and AAV too.Love Wheeler but it's going to end up being an ugly deal with an ugly term.
Jets would be best served by letting him play out his deal and letting him go after the season.
How is it a good idea to let a player like Wheeler go? The Jets have a large window to win. Pay him what he's worth, get top drawer production for at least four more seasons and then deal with the probable downward trajectory then.
He would want 7 or 8 years so would likely take 7 or 8 to get the extra years. He wont do short term because his money will get cut in half after the first is up.7 mill?? I could easily see him asking for and getting 9+ for 4-5 years and hoping he has a contract year or two left in him after that aswell to make even more. The guy had 91 points last season, if he scores close to that again with the cap going up as much as it has and might go even higher next season he should easily get 9+.
So let's say Wheeler gets 8 mil per on his next deal. Laine could reasonably ask for 9, and Ehlers already makes 6 so Connor could very well ask for the same.
That would be 29 million dollars a year wrapped up in 4 wingers, provided Wheeler doesn't make a permanent position change.
Leafs math tells us this isn't a problem.
How would his money get cut in half?He would want 7 or 8 years so would likely take 7 or 8 to get the extra years. He wont do short term because his money will get cut in half after the first is up.
I'd get rid of him and replace his dollars with Mark Stone. I think they are both UFA's next year?
and 6.125M on the PPG 1C, that deal helps a lotSo let's say Wheeler gets 8 mil per on his next deal. Laine could reasonably ask for 9, and Ehlers already makes 6 so Connor could very well ask for the same.
That would be 29 million dollars a year wrapped up in 4 wingers, provided Wheeler doesn't make a permanent position change.
and 6.125M on the PPG 1C, that deal helps a lot
Scheif is on a great deal to be sure. I don't think it's good enough to justify spending 29 mil on 4 wingers, and I've yet to see a compelling argument to support that.