Star Ocean
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2018
- 3,583
- 2,003
So childish.
Well, the one thing about Dahlin's scoring is:
all situations: 8 goals, 12 primary assists, 21 secondary assists
even strength: 4 goals, 6 primary assists, 13 secondary assists
Whereas Heiskanen:
all situations: 12 goals, 11 primary assists, 10 secondary assists
even strength: 10 goals, 6 primary assists, 8 secondary assists
Oh, even strength also:
Heiskanen individual high danger scoring chances: 21, Dahlin 11
Heiskanen rebounds created 23, Dahlin 7
All stats from naturalstattrick.
I guess the question is... How would Dahlin's ice time / PP time allocation be with Klingberg instead of Ristolainen?
Did I blame him?It doesn’t matter what could be, it matters what is. It’s not Dahlin’s fault Buffalo doesn’t have Klingberg.
Dahlin is not a prospect...I'd say Heiskanen has had the better year, but Dahlin is still a better prospect.
Honest question here......Do you feel that Dahlin has lived up to the hype? Do you feel he will?
I’m more impressed by Dahlin. Worse team, and a year younger. Can’t go wrong here though, both are absolute studs.
I’m more impressed by Dahlin. Worse team, and a year younger. Can’t go wrong here though, both are absolute studs.
I meant in the sense he had more support. The fact Dahlin was able to produce pn a putrid Buffalo team gives him an edge. Like i said its basically a toss upI don't think being on a bad team is considered an asset. Particularly if you're supposed to be a core piece on that team.
I meant in the sense he had more support. The fact Dahlin was able to produce pn a putrid Buffalo team gives him an edge. Like i said its basically a toss up
Also, they are 8 months a part in age, not a year.
Buffalo has a better offense than Dallas though and did for the entire season basically. He has only been able to produce with Buffalo's big 3 Reinhart-Eichel-Skinner. Just 9 of his 41 points have come away from them