NVious
Registered User
- Dec 20, 2022
- 1,020
- 1,998
Stutzle is better than Matthews at half the cost, easily him.
Yeah they deleted it. [mod]You posted this 5 posts ago, are you okay?
Yeah they deleted it. [mod]
Yes I’ve read 3x since you’ve tripled down on it, it’s still a funny statement, no matter how many times you say it.I clearly just wrote "Which is my point, Ottawa doesn't have the pieces to get Suzuki in a trade.
Sure thing. Stutzle is one dimensional. Wouldn't you agree?It's still there.
Better contract? Stutzle or Suzuki?
I don't see Ottawa having the pieces to acquire Nick Suzuki. Now that’s funny, holy hyperbole.forums.hfboards.com
Is this your third time posting it?
Maybe you should say it one more time, just in case not everyone doesn't see how you feel.
Sure thing. Stutzle is one dimensional. Wouldn't you agree?
Sure thing. Stutzle is one dimensional. Wouldn't you agree?
Lmao.Yes I’ve read 3x since you’ve tripled down on it, it’s still a funny statement, no matter how many times you say it.
One dimensional player and loves to dive. Compared to Suzuki who's much more well rounded. Has more captain traits.You forgot the second part. Try again.
heard the first time, 5 posts earlier.I'll take the better overall sound player over the kid who's one dimensional scorer and likes to dive and whine
One dimensional player and loves to dive. Compared to Suzuki who's much more well rounded. Has more captain traits.
I think he is referring to the lesser player of the two between Suzuki and Stutzle.There's too much ambiguity. Who are you referring to?
Same. Can't wait until we have a #2C for more than half the games.
Basically it's Stutzle out there by himself with Norris injured and Pinto suspended.
I expect Stutzle's PP numbers to catch up to Suzuki at which point the gap will be even larger.
For what it's worth, I don't think this was as big a down year for Stutzle as people have led on. There's been a lot of rumors he was dealing with a wrist injury for most of the season which explains the goals down and his willingness to shoot was way down.
In the past couple of weeks he looks more like the player we saw last year.
IMO this comparison isn't close despite the numbers being similar. I see Stutzle as a 1C and Suzuki as a higher end 2C.
No, I'm saying that players can rarely see the forest for the trees.Are you seriously insinuating that a given HF poster, who is at best a beer leaguer, has better knowledge of the sport than the best players in the world? I can guarantee you nobody on this forum has a grasp of the game that is half as good as Ryan O'Reilly and thinking otherwise is delusional. Contrary to popular belief, browsing twitter all day does not make you an expert on anything.
But the thing is Suzuki is the sole and only reason that mtl powerplay is somewhat functionnal.
Who does Stutlze need to get his pp working?
Look, you're the one trying to find excuses for Stutlze's lack of production on the pp. Suzuki would rack up more ES points if he wasn't constantly facing the opposing number 1 line. Only 3 forwards in the league have faced better opposition than Suzuki and none of them are named Stutlze.I guess he’s too busy putting up points at even strength at the rate of one and a half Suzuki’s.
Look, you're the one trying to find excuses for Stutlze's lack of production on the pp.
If Suzuki was on a competent team with proper linematers, he’d be PPG
He's nowhere close to a Selke level forward lol. Over the last 3 years, he has the worst +/- on the team. Hard to argue he's having a very positive effect relative to the rest of the team, even with them being so bad.while being a top 3-5 Selke forward. Suzuki is the better player.
Slaf joined that line in early NovemberThis year? Yes, definetly with Caufield atrocious shooting% and no Slaf for near half the year
What about my argument suggests that was my position?Suzuki enjoying a career high in shooting percentage is a very fair point, however wouldn't that also apply to Stutzle last year or you expecting 17%+ should be the norm for him going forward ?
I think it's pretty likely that Stutzle still has his best seasons ahead of him. Most young centers don't peak at 20/21.Suzuki being 2+ years older shouldn't have that much of an impact on the question at hand unless you believe he'll be washed by the end of his contract.
Maybe in the 2 years ahead Stutzle will get to a level significantly higher than the one he achieved last year is what you meant ? Sure if he takes that EP step then it won't be close but it's hard to say at this point in time that he'll take it.
Look, you're the one trying to find excuses for Stutlze's lack of production on the pp.
I don't seem to recall Suzuki being a whiner and a diver.I'll take the better overall sound player over the kid who's one dimensional scorer and likes to dive and whine