GrandmaCookie
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 1,841
- 2,094
That must be the worst argument you could bring to the table to downplay Suzuki defensive game lmao. It just means he plays against the toughest opposition.Caufield and Slafkovsky aren't proper linemates?
He's nowhere close to a Selke level forward lol. Over the last 3 years, he has the worst +/- on the team. Hard to argue he's having a very positive effect relative to the rest of the team, even with them being so bad.
View attachment 843200
Slaf joined that line in early November
What about my argument suggests that was my position?
Neither shooting percentages are sustainable. But Stutzle paced for 95 points during his high sh% season, while Suzuki is in pace for 79.
I think it's pretty likely that Stutzle still has his best seasons ahead of him. Most young centers don't peak at 20/21.
2023-24 Selke Trophy Tracker: March Update
With Patrice Bergeron retired, the Selke Trophy will have some new faces competing for the award for the 2023-24 NHL season.
thehockeywriters.com
Here is an interesting article written last week about the Selke candidate this season, Suzuki being in the top candidate (might be pushing it), here is some stats:
"his defensive performance has been terrific. His even-strength defense has been worth an xGAR of 4.8, ranked 11th among all forwards. His overall defensive game has also been worth an xGAR of 5.6, so he’s been quite valuable defensively.
Suzuki has played tough minutes, logging 42.8 percent of his ice time against elite competition. On a Montreal Canadiens team that’s been leaky defensively this season, he’s been one of their best shot suppressors, averaging 2.53 expected goals against per 60 minutes. "
Last edited: