Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 22,892
- 11,195
Now that’s funny, holy hyperbole.I don't see Ottawa having the pieces to acquire Nick Suzuki.
Now that’s funny, holy hyperbole.I don't see Ottawa having the pieces to acquire Nick Suzuki.
Go ahead, offer something useful to this conversation by providing a reasonable offer from Ottawa that would fetch Suzuki.Now that’s funny, holy hyperbole.
Interesting, might as well give us the lotto number's for next week while you are at it.Stutzle has 100pt potential. Can't say the same for Suzuki, he will max out at 75pts/season in his career.
As a general rule, I think many astute fans and other external observers are better evaluators of player value than players themselves. Players in most sports are historically awful at judging their peers - not every player, but it's pretty common.
I would take Stutzle, Sanderson and Tkachuk over Suzuki, but would never offer any of the 3 for him.Go ahead, offer something useful to this conversation by providing a reasonable offer from Ottawa that would fetch Suzuki.
Wait, let me guess, Ottawa has no interest in him.
Please name 30 better center than Suzuki.For what it's worth, I don't think this was as big a down year for Stutzle as people have led on. There's been a lot of rumors he was dealing with a wrist injury for most of the season which explains the goals down and his willingness to shoot was way down.
In the past couple of weeks he looks more like the player we saw last year.
IMO this comparison isn't close despite the numbers being similar. I see Stutzle as a 1C and Suzuki as a higher end 2C.
I wouldn't.I would take Stutzle, Sanderson and Tkachuk over Suzuki, but would never offer any of the 3 for him.
I would take Stutzle, Sanderson and Tkachuk over Suzuki, but would never offer any of the 3 for him.
Big words from a fanbase that yet again is down in the basement for seven years straight after boasting all summet. I'm guessing the classic yearly streak is having a big effect on the fanbase again.
Big words from a fanbase that yet again is down in the basement for seven years straight after boasting all summer. I'm guessing the classic yearly streak is having a big effect on the fanbase again.
If Suzuki was on a competent team with proper linematers, he’d be PPG while being a top 3-5 Selke forward. Suzuki is the better player.Stutzle and it's not close. Are people forgetting he had 90 points last year in only 78 games?
Suzuki is currently enjoying a career high in shooting percentage, while Stutzle is suffering from a career low. And their production is still nearly identical this year.
Last 2 years:
Stutzle
57 goals 158 points in 150gp
Suzuki
56 goals 135 points in 156gp
Stutzle is 2+ years younger. This isn't close.
Top 3-5 Selke, funny stuff,If Suzuki was on a competent team, he’d be PPG while being a top 3-5 Selke Dman. Suzuki is the better player.
I feel compelled to respond even if not the guy you replied to.What's so egregious about his post that warrants bringing standings into the discussion?
But if you actually watch him play, he is terrible at defending 5on5 and often cheats up the ice.
What's so egregious about his post that warrants bringing standings into the discussion?
Stutzle is a one dimensional player who also happens to be on the national diving teamHabs fans would drive Suzuki to the airport if it meant trading him straight up for Stützle.
Plus, Stützle lives in everyone’s head rent free
No your point was the Sens don’t have the assets to get Suzuki, everyone including your own fans would laugh at that suggestion.I feel compelled to respond even if not the guy you replied to.
I suggested to offer a realistic proposition to get Suzuki from Ottawa and best he could offer was that he wouldn't trade Ottawa 3 best assets in his eyes, either in a package together (which makes no sense salary cap wise) or 1v1. Which is my point, Ottawa doesn't have the pieces to get Suzuki in a trade. I don't see a realistic scenario where Ottawa offer something for Suzuki that Hughes would accept.
In all fairness, this is not the subject of the trade so let's get back to the main course.
How about you read the whole post before quoting it lmao?No your point was the Sens don’t have the assets to get Suzuki, everyone including your own fans would laugh at that suggestion.
I'll take the better overall sound player over the kid who's one dimensional scorer and likes to dive and whin