It's not deeply flawed if you know how to look at stats and track trends where you realize they will change as time moves forward and you get to see more of a sample size. Look at the Habs for example, we are doing well in the last 4 years but you also have to realize that it's early. I used 10 years and multiple 4 year spans cause it's the most recent and it's applied equally to all teams so there is more value to this than saying the Ducks are the best drafting teams with nothing to back it up other than looking at the Ducks only.
Look at the trends and what you thought previously before looking at my post... What teams near the top don't belong? I think my research confirms what we all thought to begin with
The draft position power is important and I REPEAT, IT'S APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL TEAMS and I have ran various different forms of formulas to find similar results where the typical teams that we think draft well are near the top.
IMO, there is way more value to this than ranking prospect pools where we are all taking guesses on how good or bad certain prospects will be. This is actual results and factual info where there is no opinions. Rules are applied to each team equally