You said in post #64:
If the player is on an AHL deal, they are not Kings property, they are Monarchs property and can sign with any nhl team as long as they clear waivers.
This is factually untrue. There are no waivers needed for an AHL player to sign an NHL contract in the scenario you posted in #64. Waivers might be needed to send that player back to the AHL after signing the NHL contract, but the way you've written your example that's not included.
You essentially repeat the same thing in post #66:
If the NHL team has the rights but has not signed the player, then guess what, they need to clear waivers, as I stated. I believe the last team the player payed for has first right to claim them. This is what happened with Chris Chelios when he played for the Wolves.
You have a variety of things wrong in #66, but we will focus on the waivers issue. In no way, shape, or form does an unsigned player need to clear NHL waivers just to sign an NHL contract in the scenario you have posted. You are attempting to use 13.23 as your "proof" that they do, but as you posted some that section in post #71 it can plainly be seen that it does not apply.