Does anyone actually give a rat's ass about the XFL?
Does anyone actually give a rat's ass about the XFL?
Bars called up. Good news for such an underperforming oline.
I do. Well, I can't say I care like I do about the regular NFL, but I'm all for another league. I actually quite enjoyed watching the AAF last year, actually.
Nobody filling in is Hicks but I think the Bears defensive line is the place they could absorb a loss the most by a fair margin.
You mean the defense of the run game? Hicks plays on the D line.
Of course I did. Raiders rushed for 170 yards on 39 carries including some random rookie going for 125 and almost a 5 ypc average.
Did not disappoint. My favorite:
Did you watch the Oakland game where some random running back ran all over them? The D line was awful without Hicks. Roquan being mentally (and physically) absent didn't help.
Yes, they do have depth there, but his importance cannot be understated.
You are a married man now. You have to pick your battles. I strongly advise you not to make watching the XFL one of them. Do some apple picking, go to the theater, or whatever it is to build up those points.
Someone needs to explain to me why the Lambeau Leap is not a delay of game (unsportsmanlike) penalty.
Or when Smith sacked Stafford in the first quarter and did a lay down celly thingy.
Two sets of rules in the NFL.
Not to mention the 4-5 delay of game penalties that GB gets away with each game. Apparently double zeros on the play clock don't apply evenly to all NFL quarterbacks.
Why not just do all of the above? I'm not saying I'm going to change my Sunday plans because of the XFL, but I will support it and pay attention when I am able to.
And why? Because it's football!
To each their own, but I'll never understand it personally.
I can't find enough time to watch the real sports that I want to watch so the idea of following a start up league that is likely going to fold in a year or two anyways is a non starter.
Did you watch the Oakland game where some random running back ran all over them? The D line was awful without Hicks. Roquan being mentally (and physically) absent didn't help.
Yes, they do have depth there, but his importance cannot be understated.
Apparently the Lambeau Leap was grandfathered in as legal (preferential treatment, much).Someone needs to explain to me why the Lambeau Leap is not a delay of game (unsportsmanlike) penalty.
Or when Smith sacked Stafford in the first quarter and did a lay down celly thingy.
Two sets of rules in the NFL.
Not to mention the 4-5 delay of game penalties that GB gets away with each game. Apparently double zeros on the play clock don't apply evenly to all NFL quarterbacks.
Random RB? 1st round pick, 1st RB taken, 9th in rushing yds (5 games, most have 6), 6th in yds per game.
Hicks and Smith were out against Minnesota when they held Cook to 35 yds rushing. Losing Hicks isn't great, but I'd rather lose a player from a position of good depth.
Of course I did. Raiders rushed for 170 yards on 39 carries including some random rookie going for 125 and almost a 5 ypc average.
That "random" running back (Joshua Jacobs) was a first-rounder Oakland acquired from the Mack trade.